Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0517: Case C-517/24, Broski: Order of the Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) of 26 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Dyscyplinarny przy Sądzie Apelacyjnym w Gdańsku – Poland) – VG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Rule of law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Judicial independence – Izba Odpowiedzialności Zawodowej (Chamber of Professional Responsibility) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Possibility of calling into question a final disciplinary conviction at the stage of a procedure for the cumulation of penalties – Manifest inadmissibility)

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0542: Case C-542/24, Maski: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 September 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Słupsku – Poland) – A. B. v Skarb Państwa – Państwowe Gospodarstwo Leśne Lasy Państwowe Nadleśnictwo C. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Rule of law – Independence of the judiciary – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by EU law – Principle of judicial independence – Examination of the case on appeal by a single-Judge formation – Option for the president of the court to refer the case to a three-Judge formation – Question of a hypothetical nature – Impossibility, for the referring court to take into account, unde

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0549: Case C-549/24, Direktor na Natsionalno tol upravlenie: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 October 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad – Varna – Bulgaria) – BR v Direktor na Natsionalno tol upravlenie, Agentsia Patna infrastruktura (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court of Justice and the link between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility)

RSS
First25962597259825992601260326042605Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top