Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0285: Case C-285/24, Coopservice: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato – Italy) – Coopservice soc. coop. p.a, acting on its own behalf and as agent of GME constituted with the principals Natuna Srl and XC Srl v Consip SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public procurement – Exclusion of a tenderer from the award procedure – Enforcement of the provisional security – Automatic application of that penalty – Tenderer having already been awarded a lot of the same call for tenders – Principle of proportionality – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the rea

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0288: Case C-288/24, Stegmon: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin – Germany) – Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin v M.R. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Criminal proceedings – Pre-trial detention of the accused person – Consequence of a reference for a preliminary ruling on the main proceedings – Refusal by the referring court to continue the proceedings on the substance of the case until the response of the Court of Justice has been received – Principle of proceeding expeditiously in criminal proceedings particularly in cases involving detention – Recusal of the Chair of the panel hearing the application for legitimate suspicion of conflict of interests)

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0336: CaseC-336/24, SINHRON INVEST: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad – Bulgaria) – SINHRON INVEST EOOD v Sofiyska gradska prokuratura (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions referred for a preliminary ruling that are identical to questions on which the Court has already ruled – Article 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Presumption of innocence and rights of the defence – Imposition of a criminal penalty on a legal person for an offence relating to value added tax (VAT) committed by the representative of that legal person – Parallel criminal proceedings against that representative that have no

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0372: CaseC-372/24, Ministarstvo pravosuđa (Remuneration of Croatian judges of first instance): Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravni sud u Rijeci – Croatia) – B. B. v Ministarstvo pravosuđa, uprave i digitalne transformacije Republike Hrvatske (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Remuneration of judges of first instance – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislatures and executives of the Member States to set the detailed rule

0 0

CELEX:62024CB0374: Case C-374/24, UNMLibres – II: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 April 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail du Brabant wallon – Division Nivelles – Belgium) – UF v Union Nationale des Mutualités Libres (Partenamut) (UNMLibres) (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

RSS
First25932594259525962598260026012602Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top