Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0282: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Polismyndigheten v Konkurrensverket.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 72 – Modification of a framework agreement during its term – Value of the modification below the values laid down in Article 72(2) – Modification of the remuneration model of a framework agreement – Substantial modification of a framework agreement – Alteration of the overall nature of a framework agreement.#Case C-282/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0282_RES: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Polismyndigheten v Konkurrensverket.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 72 – Modification of a framework agreement during its term – Value of the modification below the values laid down in Article 72(2) – Modification of the remuneration model of a framework agreement – Substantial modification of a framework agreement – Alteration of the overall nature of a framework agreement.#Case C-282/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0283: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 April 2025.#B. F. v Kypriaki Dimokratia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – International protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46(3) – Requirement for a full and ex nunc examination – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Scope of the powers of the court or tribunal of first instance – National legislation that makes no provision for a power to order a medical examination of the applicant for international protection.#Case C-283/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0283_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 April 2025.#B. F. v Kypriaki Dimokratia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Dikastirio Diethnous Prostasias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – International protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 46(3) – Requirement for a full and ex nunc examination – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Scope of the powers of the court or tribunal of first instance – National legislation that makes no provision for a power to order a medical examination of the applicant for international protection.#Case C-283/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0286:           Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 29 janvier 2026.#Meliá Hotels International, S.A. contre Associação Ius Omnibus.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Actions en dommages et intérêts en droit national pour les infractions aux dispositions du droit de la concurrence des États membres et de l’Union européenne – Directive 2014/104/UE – Article 5, paragraphe 1 – Champ d’application – Action déclarative spéciale pour la production de documents préalable à l’introduction éventuelle d’une action en dommages et intérêts – Appréciation de la plausibilité de la demande de dommages et intérêts.#Affaire C-286/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0286_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 29 janvier 2026.#Meliá Hotels International, S.A. contre Associação Ius Omnibus.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Actions en dommages et intérêts en droit national pour les infractions aux dispositions du droit de la concurrence des États membres et de l’Union européenne – Directive 2014/104/UE – Article 5, paragraphe 1 – Champ d’application – Action déclarative spéciale pour la production de documents préalable à l’introduction éventuelle d’une action en dommages et intérêts – Appréciation de la plausibilité de la demande de dommages et intérêts.#Affaire C-286/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0287: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Ligue royale belge pour la protection des oiseaux ASBL v Région wallonne.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Practices beneficial for the climate and the environment – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/484 – Validity – Obligation to state reasons – Invasion of Ukraine by Russia – Increase in the agricultural production potential of the European Union – Derogation from certain conditions relating to the direct greening payment – Land lying fallow considered as a distinct crop and ecological focus area even if it has been grazed, harvested for production purposes or cultivated – Necessary and justifiable nature of the measures adopted.#Case C-287/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0287_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Ligue royale belge pour la protection des oiseaux ASBL v Région wallonne.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Practices beneficial for the climate and the environment – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/484 – Validity – Obligation to state reasons – Invasion of Ukraine by Russia – Increase in the agricultural production potential of the European Union – Derogation from certain conditions relating to the direct greening payment – Land lying fallow considered as a distinct crop and ecological focus area even if it has been grazed, harvested for production purposes or cultivated – Necessary and justif

RSS
First25902591259225932595259725982599Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top