Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0186_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 March 2025.#Dr. Matthäus Metzler, agissant en qualité d’administrateur de l’insolvabilité v Auto1 European Cars B.V.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) 2015/848 – Insolvency proceedings – Article 31(1) – Awareness of the insolvency proceedings – Obligations for the benefit of a debtor which should be honoured for the benefit of the insolvency practitioner – Sale of an asset (car) by the debtor after the opening of the insolvency proceedings – Honouring of an obligation to a debtor.#Case C-186/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0188:           Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 16 juin 2026.#WebGroup Czech Republic, a.s. e.a. contre Ministre de la Culture e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Commerce électronique – Directive 2000/31/CE – Services de la société de l’information – Article 2, sous h) – Domaine coordonné – Article 3 – Restriction à la libre circulation des services de la société de l’information en provenance d’un autre État membre – Dérogation – Article 14 – Hébergement – Article 15 – Absence d’obligation générale de surveillance – Service électronique d’accès à du contenu pornographique – Réglementation nationale interdisant la fourniture de tels contenus à des mineurs et obligeant le prestataire à mettre en place un système de vérification d’âge – Articles 1 et 24 de la charte des droits fond

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0188_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 16 juin 2026.#WebGroup Czech Republic, a.s. e.a. contre Ministre de la Culture e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Commerce électronique – Directive 2000/31/CE – Services de la société de l’information – Article 2, sous h) – Domaine coordonné – Article 3 – Restriction à la libre circulation des services de la société de l’information en provenance d’un autre État membre – Dérogation – Article 14 – Hébergement – Article 15 – Absence d’obligation générale de surveillance – Service électronique d’accès à du contenu pornographique – Réglementation nationale interdisant la fourniture de tels contenus à des mineurs et obligeant le prestataire à mettre en place un système de vérification d’âge – Articles 1 et 24 de la charte des droits

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0196: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#xx v ww and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation between the courts of Member States in civil or commercial matters – Regulation (EU) 2020/1783 – Article 12(2) – Request made to the requested court for the execution of a measure of inquiry adopted by the requesting court – Grounds for refusal to execute such a request – Rule of substantive law of the requested Member State – Taking of the evidence considered to be contrary to the fundamental principles of the law of the requested Member State – Exhumation of a body for the purpose of establishing parentage – Post-mortem genetic testing – Articles 1 and 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the E

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0196_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#xx contre ww e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile ou commerciale entre les juridictions des États membres – Règlement (UE) 2020/1783 – Article 12, paragraphe 2 – Demande à la juridiction requise de procéder à l’exécution d’une mesure d’instruction adoptée par la juridiction requérante – Motifs de refus d’exécuter une telle demande – Règle de droit matériel de l’État membre requis – Obtention d’une preuve considérée comme étant contraire à des principes fondamentaux du droit de l’État membre requis – Exhumation d’un corps aux fins d’établissement d’un lien de filiation – Expertise génétique post mortem – Articles 1er et 7 de la

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0197: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#AK v RU.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Mestský súd Bratislava IV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Scope – Article 2(1) and (3) – Concept of ‘undertaking’ – Concept of ‘commercial transaction’ – Contract for the provision of legal services with a view to setting up a commercial company – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 2(b) – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Natural person who engaged the services of a lawyer with a view to setting up a commercial company.#Case C-197/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0197_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#AK v RU.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Scope – Article 2(1) and (3) – Concept of ‘undertaking’ – Concept of ‘commercial transaction’ – Contract for the provision of legal services with a view to setting up a commercial company – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 2(b) – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Natural person who engaged the services of a lawyer with a view to setting up a commercial company.#Case C-197/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0198: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#TQ v Mr Green Limited.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 – European Account Preservation Order procedure to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters – Conditions for issuing – Article 7(1) – Urgency – Real risk that, without such a measure, the subsequent enforcement of the claim will be impeded or made substantially more difficult – Nature of that risk – Circumstances which may demonstrate the existence of that risk – Past actions of the debtor – Obstacles to enforcement in the Member State in which that debtor is domiciled – Legislation of a Member State which provides for the inadmissibility of any legal actio

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0198_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#TQ v Mr Green Limited.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 – European Account Preservation Order procedure to facilitate cross-border debt recovery in civil and commercial matters – Conditions for issuing – Article 7(1) – Urgency – Real risk that, without such a measure, the subsequent enforcement of the claim will be impeded or made substantially more difficult – Nature of that risk – Circumstances which may demonstrate the existence of that risk – Past actions of the debtor – Obstacles to enforcement in the Member State in which that debtor is domiciled – Legislation of a Member State which provides for the inadmissibility of any legal a

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0199: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#ND v Legal Newsdesk Sweden AB, anciennement Garrapatica AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Scope – Making information relating to criminal convictions available to the public online in return for remuneration – Reconciling the right to protection of personal data with the right to freedom of expression and information – Article 79 – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Scope – Article 85 – Concept of processing of personal data carried out for ‘journalistic purposes’.#Case C-199/24.

RSS
First25802581258225832585258725882589Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top