Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0151: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v V. M.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/98/EU – Rights for third-country workers who hold a single permit – Article 12 – Right to equal treatment – Third-country national – Residence permit for family reasons – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Coordination of social security systems – Article 3 – Concept of ‘branches of social security’ – Article 70 – Special non-contributory cash benefits – Social allowance for the elderly living in indigence – Conditions for granting – Exclusion of third-country nationals who do not hold an EU residence permit for long-term residents.#Case C-151/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0151_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v V. M.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte costituzionale.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/98/EU – Rights for third-country workers who hold a single permit – Article 12 – Right to equal treatment – Third-country national – Residence permit for family reasons – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Coordination of social security systems – Article 3 – Concept of ‘branches of social security’ – Article 70 – Special non-contributory cash benefits – Social allowance for the elderly living in indigence – Conditions for granting – Exclusion of third-country nationals who do not hold an EU residence permit for long-term reside

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0155: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 April 2026.#Nederlandse Voedsel- en Warenautoriteit and Others v Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related products – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 3(1) – Maximum emission levels for tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide – Article 4(1) – Measurement methods – Measurement of emission levels on the basis of the ISO standards referred to in Article 4(1) – Standards not published in the Official Journal of the European Union – Enforceability of those ISO standards – Article 2 TEU – Value of the rule of law – Requirement of free access to such standards.#Case C-155/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0155_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 April 2026.#Nederlandse Voedsel- en Warenautoriteit and Others v Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related products – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 3(1) – Maximum emission levels for tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide – Article 4(1) – Measurement methods – Measurement of emission levels on the basis of the ISO standards referred to in Article 4(1) – Standards not published in the Official Journal of the European Union – Enforceability of those ISO standards – Article 2 TEU – Value of the rule of law – Requirement of free access to such standards.#Case C-155/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0161: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#OSA, z.s., anciennement OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, z.s. v Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Collective management organisation handling copyright – Rates for royalties for the provision of a licence to make copyrighted works available – Hotel establishments – Calculation method – Failure to take into account the rate of occupancy of rooms – Unfair prices.#Case C-161/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0161_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#OSA, z.s., anciennement OSA – Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním, z.s. contre Úřad pro ochranu hospodářské soutěže.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Concurrence – Article 102 TFUE – Abus de position dominante – Organisme de gestion collective des droits d’auteur – Tarification des redevances pour l’octroi d’une licence de mise à disposition d’œuvres protégées par le droit d’auteur – Établissements hôteliers – Méthode de calcul – Absence de prise en compte du taux d’occupation des chambres – Prix non équitables.#Affaire C-161/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0164_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 April 2025.#Cityland EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ – Veliko Tarnovo.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Persistent failure to comply with tax obligations – Removal of the taxable person from the value added tax (VAT) identification register – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-164/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0168: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#PMJC SAS v [W] [X] and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 12(2)(b) – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 20(b) – Grounds for revocation of a mark – Trade mark liable to mislead the public as a result of the use made of it – Trade mark corresponding to the name of a fashion designer – Assignment of the trade mark – Use of the trade mark in such a way as to make the public actually believe that the designer is still involved in the design of the goods bearing the trade mark – Misled belief.#Case C-168/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0168_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#PMJC SAS v [W] [X] and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 12(2)(b) – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 20(b) – Grounds for revocation of a mark – Trade mark liable to mislead the public as a result of the use made of it – Trade mark corresponding to the name of a fashion designer – Assignment of the trade mark – Use of the trade mark in such a way as to make the public actually believe that the designer is still involved in the design of the goods bearing the trade mark – Misled belief.#Case C-168/24.

RSS
First25782579258025812583258525862587Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top