november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0142: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#Familienstiftung v Finanzamt Köln-West.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Inheritance and gift tax – Taxation of the inter vivos transfer of assets in order to set up a foundation – Family foundation with its seat in Liechtenstein – Coherence of the tax system.#Case C-142/24.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0142_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#Familienstiftung v Finanzamt Köln-West.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Inheritance and gift tax – Taxation of the inter vivos transfer of assets in order to set up a foundation – Family foundation with its seat in Liechtenstein – Coherence of the tax system.#Case C-142/24.
januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0144: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Freedom of establishment – National legislation establishing reference prices for certain basic construction materials below market prices – Obligation to pay an ‘additional mining fee’ corresponding to 90% of the difference between the reference price and the selling price – Measure mainly affecting undertakings held by companies established in other Member States – No justification – Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Article 1(1)(d) – Concept of ‘other requirements’.#Case C-144/24.
maj 01, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0144_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Freedom of establishment – National legislation establishing reference prices for certain basic construction materials below market prices – Obligation to pay an ‘additional mining fee’ corresponding to 90% of the difference between the reference price and the selling price – Measure mainly affecting undertakings held by companies established in other Member States – No justification – Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Article 1(1)(d) – Concept of ‘other requirements’.#Case C-144/24.
november 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0146: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Fugro NV v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Taxation – Combating of tax avoidance – Directive (EU) 2022/2523 – Global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union – Article 17 – International shipping income exclusion – Challenge to the scope of that exclusion – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Locus standi – Lack of individual concern.#Case C-146/24 P.
junij 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0146_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Fugro NV v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Taxation – Combating of tax avoidance – Directive (EU) 2022/2523 – Global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union – Article 17 – International shipping income exclusion – Challenge to the scope of that exclusion – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Locus standi – Lack of individual concern.#Case C-146/24 P.
junij 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0147: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#V v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 20 TFEU – Citizenship of the Union – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 5(a) and (b) – Obligation to take account of the best interests of the child and of family life – Article 6(2) – Decision of the competent authority of the host Member State refusing to grant a derived right of residence on its territory to the third-country national, who is the parent of a minor child who is a Union citizen, and ordering that third-country national to go immediately to another Member State – Interference with the exercise by a Union citizen of his or her right of free movement and reside
junij 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0147_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#V v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 20 TFEU – Citizenship of the Union – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 5(a) and (b) – Obligation to take account of the best interests of the child and of family life – Article 6(2) – Decision of the competent authority of the host Member State refusing to grant a derived right of residence on its territory to the third-country national, who is the parent of a minor child who is a Union citizen, and ordering that third-country national to go immediately to another Member State – Interference with the exercise by a Union citizen of his or her right of free movement and re
marec 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0150: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#A v Rikoskomisario B.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Common standards and procedures for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Detention for the purpose of removal – Article 15(5) and (6) – Calculation of the length of the detention already completed – Aggregation of all of the previous periods of detention – Conditions – Enforcement of one and the same return decision – Second sentence of Article 15(3) – Prolonged detention beyond the initial maximum period laid down under Article 15(5) – Review by a judicial authority – National legislation making the implementation of that review contingent on an application by the detained person – Point in time
marec 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0150_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#A v Rikoskomisario B.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Common standards and procedures for returning illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Detention for the purpose of removal – Article 15(5) and (6) – Calculation of the length of the detention already completed – Aggregation of all of the previous periods of detention – Conditions – Enforcement of one and the same return decision – Second sentence of Article 15(3) – Prolonged detention beyond the initial maximum period laid down under Article 15(5) – Review by a judicial authority – National legislation making the implementation of that review contingent on an application by the detained person – Point in t