oktober 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0218: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Felicísima v Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España, Sociedad Anónima Operadora, Sociedad Unipersonal and IATA España SLU.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage by air – Montreal Convention – Article 17(2) – Concept of ‘baggage’ – Article 22(2) – Air carrier liability in the event of loss of baggage – Loss of a passenger’s pet – Compensation for non-material damage.#Case C-218/24.
januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0218_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Felicísima v Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España SA Operadora Unipersonal and IATA España SLU.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil n° 4 de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage by air – Montreal Convention – Article 17(2) – Concept of ‘baggage’ – Article 22(2) – Air carrier liability in the event of loss of baggage – Loss of a passenger’s pet – Compensation for non-material damage.#Case C-218/24.
junij 12, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0219: Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 12 juin 2025.#A e.a. contre Tallinna linn.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Protection de la sécurité et de la santé des travailleurs – Directive 89/391/CEE – Mesures visant à promouvoir l’amélioration de la sécurité et de la santé des travailleurs au travail – Articles 5, 6 et 9 – Obligations incombant aux employeurs – Directive 2000/54/CE – Protection des travailleurs contre les risques liés à l’exposition à des agents biologiques au travail – Article 14, paragraphe 3 – Surveillance médicale – Mise à disposition de vaccins efficaces – Annexe VII, points 1 et 2 – Réglementation nationale permettant à l’employeur de soumettre le travailleur exposé à un risque biologique à une obligation vaccinale – Virus SARS‑CoV‑2 This document does not exist in English.
oktober 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0219_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 June 2025.#A and Others v Tallinna linn.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 89/391/EEC – Measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work – Articles 5, 6 and 9 – Obligations on employers – Directive 2000/54/EC – Protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work – Article 14(3) – Health surveillance – Making available of effective vaccines – Annex VII, points 1 and 2 – National legislation allowing employers to require workers who are exposed to a biological risk to undergo vaccination – SARS-CoV-2 virus.#Case C-219/24.
februar 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0220: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Regia Autonomă Aeroportul Internaţional „Avram Iancu” Cluj v Consiliul Concurenţei.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Directive 96/67/EC – Access to the groundhandling market at EU airports – Article 1 – Scope – Airports whose annual traffic is less than two million passenger movements – Refusal of access to airport infrastructure at such an airport – Article 6 – Groundhandling for third parties – Applicability of the competition rules – Article 102 TFEU.#Case C-220/24.
avgust 21, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0220_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Regia Autonomă Aeroportul Internaţional „Avram Iancu” Cluj v Consiliul Concurenţei.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Directive 96/67/EC – Access to the groundhandling market at EU airports – Article 1 – Scope – Airports whose annual traffic is less than two million passenger movements – Refusal of access to airport infrastructure at such an airport – Article 6 – Groundhandling for third parties – Applicability of the competition rules – Article 102 TFEU.#Case C-220/24.
oktober 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0221: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Naturvårdsverket v UQ and IC.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Waste – Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 – Article 24(2) – Shipment – Take-back when a shipment is illegal – Take-back of the waste by the competent authority of dispatch – Obligation or possibility for that authority to recover or dispose of the waste despite opposition by the initial dispatcher – Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Validity.#Joined Cases C-221/24 and C-222/24.
oktober 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0221_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Naturvårdsverket v UQ and IC.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Waste – Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 – Article 24(2) – Shipment – Take-back when a shipment is illegal – Take-back of the waste by the competent authority of dispatch – Obligation or possibility for that authority to recover or dispose of the waste despite opposition by the initial dispatcher – Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Validity.#Joined Cases C-221/24 and C-222/24.
februar 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0223: Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 27 février 2025.#Oil company "Lukoil" PAO contre Registre de transparence e.a.#Pourvoi – Droit institutionnel – Accord interinstitutionnel sur un registre de transparence obligatoire – Radiation de la requérante du registre de transparence – Notification de la décision par voie électronique – Délai de recours – Caractère tardif du recours.#Affaire C-223/24 P. This document does not exist in English.
julij 10, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0224: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Società Eredi Raimondo Bufarini Srl – Servizi Ambientali v Ministero dell'Interno and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances – Directive 2012/18/EU – Article 2 – Scope – Article 3(12) – Concept of ‘presence of dangerous substances’ – Continuous monitoring of substances actually present within an establishment – Anticipated or reasonably foreseeable presence – Determination by reference to the maximum quantities of substances indicated in the operating permit.#Case C-224/24.