Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0512_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#BÁV Zrt. v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals – Annex XVII – Restrictions on the manufacture, placing on the market and use of certain dangerous substances, mixtures and articles – Restrictions concerning cadmium – Maximum concentration in metal parts of jewellery and imitation jewellery articles and hair accessories – Derogation – Silver bracelet dating from the 1940s, the brazing of which contains cadmium.#Case C-512/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0513: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Oblastní nemocnice Kolín, a. s., nemocnice Středočeského kraje v Odvolací finanční ředitelství.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Right to deduct VAT – Article 173(1) – Proportional deduction – Expenditure forming part of the general costs of a taxable person – Minimum technical and material equipment of healthcare facilities required in order to obtain a licence to supply healthcare services in respect of which VAT is not deductible – Services necessary for the supply of services in respect of which VAT is deductible.#Case C-513/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0514: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#Magyar Telekom Nyrt. v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság Elnöke.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Telecommunications sector – Directive (EU) 2018/1972 – European Electronic Communications Code – First subparagraph of Article 105(4) – Right of end-users to terminate their contact without further costs due to modifications unilaterally proposed by a provider of electronic communication services – Exceptions – Modifications directly imposed by EU law or national law.#Case C-514/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0515: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#Randstad España SLU v Administración General del Estado.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Deduction of input VAT – Directive 2006/112/EC – Second paragraph of Article 176 – Exclusion from the right to deduct VAT – Acquisition of tickets for leisure events and services – Entry into force of the right to deduct VAT on the date of accession of the Kingdom of Spain to the European Economic Community – Standstill clause.#Case C-515/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0516: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#BC, légalement représenté par sa représentante légale v LG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of Freedom, Security and Justice – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 – Jurisdiction in matters relating to maintenance obligations – Article 12 – Lis pendens – Determination of the court first seised – Article 9(a) – Concept of an ‘equivalent document’ with regard to a document instituting the proceedings – Submission of an application for legal aid before a court of a Member State by a maintenance creditor with a view to bringing an action for the variation of maintenance obligations owed to him or her – Subsequent application submitted by the maintenance debtor to vary his or her ma

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0521: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#Aptiv Services Hungary Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Intra-Community acquisition of goods – Article 168 – Deduction of input VAT due in respect of such an acquisition – Articles 178 and 179 – Rules governing the exercise of the right to deduct VAT – Late submission of invoices necessary for the exercise of the right to deduct VAT – Refusal of the right to deduct VAT – National legislation providing for a self-correction procedure enabling the taxable person to exercise his or her right of deduction beyond the tax period during which that right arose – Principles of neutrali

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0525: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Santander Renta Variable España Pensiones, Fondo de Pensiones v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Taxation – Corporation tax on dividends – Legal person governed by Spanish law, taxable person not resident in Portugal – Withholding tax – Exemption – Standard of proof – Certificate attesting that the conditions for exemption are satisfied – Article 65 TFEU – Overriding reasons in the public interest – Effectiveness of fiscal supervision – Effective collection of tax – Cooperation and mutual assistance between the competent authorities of the Member States.#Case C-525/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0526: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Brillen Rottler GmbH & Co. KG v TC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 12(5) – Article 15(1) – Data subject’s right of access to the personal data concerning him or her – Controller’s right to refuse to act on the request for access – Excessive character of the request – Abuse of rights – First request for access – Right to compensation and liability – Article 82(1) – Action based on infringement of the right of access – Non-material damage – Loss of control over personal data.#Case C-526/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0526_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 19 mars 2026.#Brillen Rottler GmbH & Co. KG contre TC.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des personnes physiques à l’égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel – Règlement (UE) 2016/679 – Article 12, paragraphe 5 – Article 15, paragraphe 1 – Droit d’accès de la personne concernée aux données à caractère personnel la concernant – Droit du responsable du traitement de refuser de donner suite à la demande d’accès – Caractère excessif de la demande – Abus de droit – Première demande d’accès – Droit à réparation et responsabilité – Article 82, paragraphe 1 – Action fondée sur une violation du droit d’accès – Dommage moral – Perte de contrôle sur les données à caractère personnel.#Affaire C-526/24.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First25162517251825192521252325242525Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top