november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0445: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#MS Amlin Insurance SE v (W)onderweg VZW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Article 3(6) – Concept of ‘traveller’ – Legal person who has concluded a travel contract for its members.#Case C-445/24.
januar 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0445_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#MS Amlin Insurance SE v (W)onderweg VZW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Article 3(6) – Concept of ‘traveller’ – Legal person who has concluded a travel contract for its members.#Case C-445/24.
september 04, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0451: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Kwizda Pharma GmbH v Landeshauptmann von Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products – Product which may fall within the definition of ‘medicinal product’ and within the definition of ‘product covered by other Community legislation’ – Applicable legal framework – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 2(2) – Rule of precedence – Scope – Effectiveness – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-451/24.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0452: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Lunapark Scandinavia Oy Ltd v Hardeco Finland Oy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 10 – Exclusive rights of the proprietor of a registered trade mark to oppose the use, by a third party, of a sign which is identical with, or similar to, that mark – Infringement action – Limitations of the exclusive rights of the proprietor of that trade mark – Article 9 and Article 18(1) – Preclusion due to acquiescence – Exhaustive nature of the conditions under which that preclusion can arise – Inapplicability of a general principle of national law that provides for preclusion of the right to prohibit the use of a sign in situations other than those provided for in those articl
januar 13, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0452_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Lunapark Scandinavia Oy Ltd v Hardeco Finland Oy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 10 – Exclusive rights of the proprietor of a registered trade mark to oppose the use, by a third party, of a sign which is identical with, or similar to, that mark – Infringement action – Limitations of the exclusive rights of the proprietor of that trade mark – Article 9 and Article 18(1) – Preclusion due to acquiescence – Exhaustive nature of the conditions under which that preclusion can arise – Inapplicability of a general principle of national law that provides for preclusion of the right to prohibit the use of a si
januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0453: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#Sofiyska gradska prokuratura v BC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA – Mutual recognition of financial penalties – Article 7(2)(g) – Ground for non-recognition and non-execution – Informing the person concerned of his or her right to contest the case and of the time limits of such a legal remedy – Article 7(3) – Obligation to consult the competent authority of the issuing Member State.#Case C-453/24.
marec 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0457: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Romania v European Commission.#Appeal – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2020 – Expenditure excluded from European Union financing – Expenditure incurred by Romania – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 52 – Conformity clearance procedure – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 – Article 34 – Change in the legal basis of the European Commission’s proposals for financial corrections – Possibility for the Member State concerned to make its views on those proposals known in a meaningful way – Concept of ‘external factor’ – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 44 – Diversif
marec 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0458: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#DO v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 3(2) – Article 29 – Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Suspension, by the Member State responsible, of the taking charge and taking back of asylum seekers – Directive (EU) 2013/32 – Article 33 – Inadmissible applications.#Case C-458/24.
marec 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0458_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#DO v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 3(2) – Article 29 – Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Suspension, by the Member State responsible, of the taking charge and taking back of asylum seekers – Directive (EU) 2013/32 – Article 33 – Inadmissible applications.#Case C-458/24.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0461: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Asociación Petón do Lobo v Dirección Xeral de Planificación Enerxética Recursos Naturais de la Xunta de Galicia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2011/92/EU – Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment – Article 6 – Consultations with authorities likely to be concerned by the project by reason of their specific environmental responsibilities or local and regional competences, and with the public concerned – Public participation in decision-making – Article 6(3)(b) – Scope of the concept of ‘main reports and advice’.#Case C-461/24.