oktober 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0351_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 March 2025.#C/C Vámügynöki Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Veszprémi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of goods – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Article 119(3) – Error made when issuing movement certificates – Repayment or remission of import or export duties – Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin – Appendix I – Article 32 – Administrative cooperation – Verification of proofs of origin.#Case C-351/24.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0352: Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 13 novembre 2025.#PU contre Parquet européen.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Parquet européen – Règlement (UE) 2017/1939 – Article 17 – Procureurs européens délégués – Procédure de recrutement – Refus de nomination d’un candidat désigné par un État membre – Recours en annulation – Article 263 TFUE – Recevabilité – Délais de recours – Recours tardif – Décision confirmative – Absence d’éléments nouveaux substantiels – Obligation de motivation.#Affaire C-352/24 P. This document does not exist in English.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0353: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#SIA „EUROPARK LATVIA” and SKIDATA GmbH v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Industrial policy – Information procedure in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Concept of ‘technical regulation’ – National rule requiring the provision of the source code of software registered in the database of the tax authority to a body responsible for assessing the conformity of fiscal technical requirements – Article 34 TFEU – Measure having equivalent effect to a quantitative restriction on imports – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-353/24.
november 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0356: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#A.B. v Kärntner Landesregierung.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of movement for workers – Article 45 TFEU – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(1) – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – Civil servants’ salary scale – National legislation excluding the consideration of previous periods of equivalent service completed in another Member State – Exclusion following a decision, falling within the discretionary power of the administration, to grant a promotion to the civil servant – Promotion subject to completion of a certain number of years of service – National legislation excluding the consideration
oktober 02, 2025 0 14 CELEX:62024CJ0359_INF: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Case C-359/24.
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0363: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Finansinspektionen v Carnegie Investment Bank AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Market abuse – Article 7(1) – Concept of ‘inside information’ – Article 7(2) – Information of a ‘precise nature’ – Email containing information relating to the inclusion of a person in an insider list – No statement of the reasons that led to that inclusion – Correct assessment of the circumstances – Correct information – Necessity.#Case C-363/24.
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0363_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 19 mars 2026.#Finansinspektionen contre Carnegie Investment Bank AB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Règlement (UE) no 596/2014 – Abus de marché – Article 7, paragraphe 1 – Notion d’“information privilégiée” – Article 7, paragraphe 2 – Information ayant un “caractère précis” – Courriel contenant des informations relatives à l’inscription d’une personne sur une liste d’initiés – Absence de mention des raisons ayant conduit à cette inscription – Appréciation correcte des circonstances – Information correcte – Nécessité.#Affaire C-363/24. This document does not exist in English.
februar 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0364: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#Giorgio Fidenato, en son nom propre et en tant que propriétaire de l’exploitation agricole « In Trois » v Ministero dell’Agricoltura, della Sovranità Alimentare e delle Foreste.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Deliberate release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) – Measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in the environment – Directive 2001/18/EC – Article 26c(1) and (3) – Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 – Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/321 – Prohibition of the cultivation of MON 810 GMO maize in Italy – Validity – Free movement of goods – Articles 34 and 114 TFEU – Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination – Freedom to conduct a business – Articles 16 and 21 of the Char
februar 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0364_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#Giorgio Fidenato, en son nom propre et en tant que propriétaire de l’exploitation agricole « In Trois » v Ministero dell’Agricoltura, della Sovranità Alimentare e delle Foreste.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Deliberate release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) – Measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in the environment – Directive 2001/18/EC – Article 26c(1) and (3) – Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 – Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/321 – Prohibition of the cultivation of MON 810 GMO maize in Italy – Validity – Free movement of goods – Articles 34 and 114 TFEU – Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination – Freedom to conduct a business – Articles 16 and 21 of the
julij 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0365: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Purefun Group AB v Doggy AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Free movement of goods – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Trade name – Company name – National legislation conferring an exclusive right on the proprietor of a company name.#Case C-365/24.