februar 04, 2026 0 11 CELEX:62024CJ0317_INF: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Case C-317/24.
julij 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0318: Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 29 juillet 2024.#Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Direcţia Naţională Anticorupţie – Serviciul Teritorial Braşov contre P.P.R.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Mandat d’arrêt européen – Décision-cadre 2002/584/JAI – Remise des personnes recherchées aux autorités judiciaires d’émission – Respect des droits fondamentaux – Défaillances systémiques ou généralisées concernant l’indépendance du pouvoir judiciaire de l’État membre d’émission – Défaillances portant sur l’absence de preuve de la prestation de serment des juges – Interdiction des traitements inhumains ou dégradants – Conditions de détention dans l’État membre d’émission – Appréciation par l’autorité judiciai This document does not exist in English.
julij 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0318_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 29 juillet 2024.#Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Direcţia Naţională Anticorupţie – Serviciul Teritorial Braşov contre P.P.R.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Mandat d’arrêt européen – Décision-cadre 2002/584/JAI – Remise des personnes recherchées aux autorités judiciaires d’émission – Respect des droits fondamentaux – Défaillances systémiques ou généralisées concernant l’indépendance du pouvoir judiciaire de l’État membre d’émission – Défaillances portant sur l’absence de preuve de la prestation de serment des juges – Interdiction des traitements inhumains ou dégradants – Conditions de détention dans l’État membre d’émission – Appréciation par l’autorité judi This document does not exist in English.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0320: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#CR and TP v Soledil Srl, sous concordat préventif.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) of that directive – Power of review and obligations of the national court – Penalty clause – No review of the court’s own motion of whether that term is unfair – Res judicata – Principle of effectiveness – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Reliance on the unfairness of a contractual term before a court to which the case has been remitted following cassation.#Case C-320/24.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0320_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#CR et TP contre Soledil Srl, sous concordat préventif.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Article 6, paragraphe 1, et article 7, paragraphe 1 – Pouvoir de contrôle et obligations du juge national – Clause pénale – Absence de contrôle d’office du caractère abusif de cette clause – Autorité de la chose jugée – Principe d’effectivité – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Invocation du caractère abusif d’une clause contractuelle dans le cadre d’une procédure sur renvoi après cassation.#Affaire C-320/24. This document does not exist in English.
november 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0321: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#BC v S. C. P. Attal et Associés.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Article 63(1) TFEU – Succession – Mandatory use of a notary for the purpose of drawing up a declaration of succession in a Member State other than that in which the succession was opened – Legislation of that Member State providing that that notary’s fees are calculated on the basis of the total gross assets of the estate – Parallel exercise by the Member States of their powers of taxation – No restriction on the free movement of capital.#Case C-321/24.
november 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0321_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#BC v S. C. P. Attal et Associés.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Article 63(1) TFEU – Succession – Mandatory use of a notary for the purpose of drawing up a declaration of succession in a Member State other than that in which the succession was opened – Legislation of that Member State providing that that notary’s fees are calculated on the basis of the total gross assets of the estate – Parallel exercise by the Member States of their powers of taxation – No restriction on the free movement of capital.#Case C-321/24.
julij 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0322: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Sánchez Romero Carvajal Jabugo, SAU v Embutidos Monells, SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 9(1) – Action for invalidity – Bad faith on the part of the proprietor of the later trade mark when filing the application for registration of that mark – Absolute ground for invalidity – Limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Not enforceable against the proprietor of the earlier mark.#Case C-322/24.
december 11, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0322_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Sánchez Romero Carvajal Jabugo, SAU v Embutidos Monells, SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Alicante.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 9(1) – Action for invalidity – Bad faith on the part of the proprietor of the later trade mark when filing the application for registration of that mark – Absolute ground for invalidity – Limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Not enforceable against the proprietor of the earlier mark.#Case C-322/24.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0323: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Deity Shoes, S.L. v Mundorama Confort, S.L. and Stay Design, S.L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Community designs – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Articles 4 to 6 and 14 – Conditions for the protection of a design – Novelty – Individual character – Visual characteristics predetermined by a third party – Freedom of the designer in developing the design – Concept of ‘informed user’ – Influence of features linked to fashion trends.#Case C-323/24.