Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0387: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#C v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Border control, asylum and immigration – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 15(2)(b) – Detention of a third-country national for the purpose of removal – Directive 2013/33/EU – Article 9 – Detention of an applicant for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 28(2) – Detention for the purpose of transfer – Unlawful detention – Articles 6 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-387/24 PPU.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0391: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 October 2025.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments and probation decisions – Article 1 – Scope – Supervised release with an obligation to undergo inpatient medical treatment in a closed institution – Measure involving deprivation of liberty – Obligation of recognition and enforcement.#Case C-391/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0391_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 October 2025.#Criminal proceedings against.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments and probation decisions – Article 1 – Scope – Supervised release with an obligation to undergo inpatient medical treatment in a closed institution – Measure involving deprivation of liberty – Obligation of recognition and enforcement.#Case C-391/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0396: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#PU and Others v mBank S.A. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 7(1) – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency, containing unfair terms – Effects of a finding that a term is unfair – Nullity of that agreement – Repayment by the consumer of the amount of the loan obtained under a void agreement irrespective of repayments made – Deterrent effect of the prohibition on unfair terms – Acceptance by the consumer of the claim for repayment – Obligation on the national court to make the judgment against the defendant immediately enforceable.#Case C-396/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0396_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#mBank S.A. and Others v BL and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 7(1) – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency, containing unfair terms – Effects of a finding that a term is unfair – Nullity of that agreement – Repayment by the consumer of the amount of the loan obtained under a void agreement irrespective of repayments made – Deterrent effect of the prohibition on unfair terms – Acceptance by the consumer of the claim for repayment – Obligation on the national court to make the judgment against the defendant immediately enforceable.#

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0398: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#A v B.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 25(1) – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Agreement null and void as to its substantive validity under the law of the Member State of the court seised of the case – Concept.#Case C-398/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0399: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#AirHelp Germany GmbH v Austrian Airlines AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Compensation for air passengers in the event of long delay of flights – Conditions – Article 5(3) – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Concept of ‘reasonable measures’ to avoid extraordinary circumstances or the consequences thereof – Aircraft struck by lightning during the preceding flight and therefore subject to a mandatory inspection.#Case C-399/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0399_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#AirHelp Germany GmbH v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Compensation for air passengers in the event of long delay of flights – Conditions – Article 5(3) – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Concept of ‘reasonable measures’ to avoid extraordinary circumstances or the consequences thereof – Aircraft struck by lightning during the preceding flight and therefore subject to a mandatory inspection.#Case C-399/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0401: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Staten genom Sjöfartsverket v Stockholms Hamn AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Stockholms tingsrätt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Agreement concluded before the accession of the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union – Compensation for the loss of revenue arising from the abolition of passage fees for a lock – Concept of aid – Concept of undertaking – Economic activity – Existing or new aid.#Case C-401/24.

RSS
First25112512251325142516251825192520Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top