november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0570: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Transilvania Master Insolv IPURL, en tant d’administrateur judiciaire d’ Ecoserv SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 8(1)(a)(i) and (2) – Person liable to pay excise duty – Quantity of ethyl alcohol missing from a company’s business assets – Managing director of a company guilty of embezzlement and of a failure to make entries in the accounts – Determination of the person liable to pay excise duty – More than one person liable – Effect of a judgment of a criminal court delivered in respect of civil matters, finding the managing di
februar 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0572: Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 5 février 2026.#State Development Corporation "VEB.RF" contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises au regard de la situation en Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Interdiction de fourniture de services spécialisés de messagerie financière à certains établissements de crédit russes ainsi qu’à leurs filiales russes – Décision 2014/145/PESC – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous b) et d), et annexe – Règlement (UE) no 269/2014 – Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous b) et d), et annexe I – Décision 2014/512/PESC – Article 1er sexies et annexe VIII – Règlement (UE) no 833/2014 – Article 5 nonies et annexe XIV – Listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’ This document does not exist in English.
februar 20, 2026 0 6 CELEX:62024CJ0572_INF: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#State Development Corporation "VEB.RF" v Council of the European Union.#Case C-572/24 P.
oktober 02, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0573: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 October 2025.#B v Niedersächsischer Zweckverband zur Approbationserteilung (NiZzA).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Article 2 – Scope ratione personae – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 3 – Definition of ‘beneficiaries’ – Third-country national who is the spouse of a Union citizen who has not exercised his or her right of freedom of movement – Inapplicability – Inadmissibility.#Case C-573/24.
december 11, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0573_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 October 2025.#B v Niedersächsischer Zweckverband zur Approbationserteilung (NiZzA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Oldenburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Article 2 – Scope ratione personae – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 3 – Definition of ‘beneficiaries’ – Third-country national who is the spouse of a Union citizen who has not exercised his or her right of freedom of movement – Inapplicability – Inadmissibility.#Case C-573/24.
oktober 17, 2025 0 3 CELEX:62024CJ0576: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 16 octobre 2025.#TO contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour l’asile.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Agents temporaires – Résiliation du contrat – Rupture du lien de confiance – Harcèlement moral.#Affaire C-576/24 P. This document does not exist in English.
januar 20, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0588: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Imballaggi Piemontesi Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Prohibition of restrictive practices – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law conducted by the national competition authorities – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – Time limit for closure of the investigation stage of the infringement proceedings – National legislation allowing the national competition authority unilaterally to postpone that time limit on account of circumstances which lead to an extension of the subject matter of those proceedings or of the number of under
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0589: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Almirall BV and Almirall SA v Infinity Pharma BV and Pharmaline BV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Scope – Article 2(1) – Medicinal products prepared industrially or manufactured by a method involving an industrial process – Article 3(2) – Medicinal products prepared in a pharmacy in accordance with the prescriptions of a pharmacopoeia and intended to be supplied directly to the patients served by the pharmacy in question – Exclusion from the directive’s scope – National regulation subjecting the latter medicinal products to an authorisation requirement on the basis of a numerical criterion.#Case C-589/24.
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0589_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 19 mars 2026.#Almirall BV et Almirall SA contre Infinity Pharma BV et Pharmaline BV.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Médicaments à usage humain – Directive 2001/83/CE – Champ d’application – Article 2, paragraphe 1 – Médicaments préparés industriellement ou fabriqués selon une méthode dans laquelle intervient un processus industriel – Article 3, point 2 – Médicaments préparés en pharmacie selon les indications d’une pharmacopée et destinés à être délivrés directement aux patients approvisionnés par cette pharmacie – Exclusion du champ d’application – Réglementation nationale soumettant ces derniers médicaments à une obligation d’autorisation en fonction d’un critère numérique.#Affaire C-589/24. This document does not exist in English.
januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0590: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement procedures – Directive 2014/23 – Award of concession contracts – Directive 2014/24 – Grounds for exclusion – National legislation establishing a register of public sector partners – Requirement of impartiality on the part of the person authorised to enter the public sector partner in that register – Imposition of a fine for non-compliance with that requirement – Automatic exclusion from participation in public procurement procedures in the event of non-payment of that fine – Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Criminal nature of the penalty – Predictability and proportionality of that penalty – Principle of legal certaint