december 13, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0781: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2024.#Malmö Motorrenovering AB v Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 250 – Temporary admission procedure – Article 251 – Period during which goods imported under that procedure may remain – Period insufficient for achieving the objective of authorised use – Customs debt incurred through non-compliance with that period – Conditions for extending that period – Importation of a racing car.#Case C-781/23.
avgust 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0781_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2024.#Malmö Motorrenovering AB v Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 250 – Temporary admission procedure – Article 251 – Period during which goods imported under that procedure may remain – Period insufficient for achieving the objective of authorised use – Customs debt incurred through non-compliance with that period – Conditions for extending that period – Importation of a racing car.#Case C-781/23.
maj 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0782: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 May 2025.#„Tauritus“ UAB v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Method for determining the customs value – Article 70 – Transaction value – Goods imported on the basis of a provisional purchase price – Definitive price dependent on various factors not known on the date of acceptance of the customs declaration.#Case C-782/23.
december 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0782_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 May 2025.#„Tauritus“ UAB v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Method for determining the customs value – Article 70 – Transaction value – Goods imported on the basis of a provisional purchase price – Definitive price dependent on various factors not known on the date of acceptance of the customs declaration.#Case C-782/23.
julij 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0783: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Liège Airport Security v État belge, représenté par le Ministre de l’Intérieur.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 – Civil aviation security – Article 4 – Common basic standards – Article 9 – Appropriate authority – Member State’s obligation to designate a single authority to be responsible for the coordination and monitoring of the implementation of safety standards – Scope – National authority responsible for ensuring compliance with national regulations governing the exercise of private safety activities.#Case C-783/23.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0783_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Liège Airport Security v État belge, représenté par le Ministre de l’Intérieur.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 – Civil aviation security – Article 4 – Common basic standards – Article 9 – Appropriate authority – Member State’s obligation to designate a single authority to be responsible for the coordination and monitoring of the implementation of safety standards – Scope – National authority responsible for ensuring compliance with national regulations governing the exercise of private safety activities.#Case C-783/23.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0784: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#OÜ Voore Mets and AS Lemeks Põlva v Keskkonnaamet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of wild birds – Article 5 – Prohibitions to ensure the protection of birds – Article 9 – Derogations – Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Prohibition on felling trees during the period of bird breeding and rearing.#Case C-784/23.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0784_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#OÜ Voore Mets and AS Lemeks Põlva v Keskkonnaamet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of wild birds – Article 5 – Prohibitions to ensure the protection of birds – Article 9 – Derogations – Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Prohibition on felling trees during the period of bird breeding and rearing.#Case C-784/23.
junij 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0785: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite v „Bulgarian posts“ EAD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest – Article 132 – Public postal services – Directive 97/67/EC – Article 12 – Universal postal service provider – Concepts of ‘public postal service’ and ‘public interest service’.#Case C-785/23.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0785_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite v „Bulgarian posts“ EAD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions for certain activities in the public interest – Article 132 – Public postal services – Directive 97/67/EC – Article 12 – Universal postal service provider – Concepts of ‘public postal service’ and ‘public interest service’.#Case C-785/23.