Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0085: Case T-85/23: Judgment of the General Court of 6 December 2023 — DGC Switzerland v EUIPO (cyberscan) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark cyberscan — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Sufficiently direct and specific relationship with the goods and services covered by the trade mark application — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0088: Case T-88/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – Kande Mupompa v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of assets – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists of persons concerned – Proof that maintaining him on the lists was well-founded – Error of assessment – Change in the factual and legal circumstances leading to the adoption and maintenance of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0089: Case T-89/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 July 2024 – Boshab v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of assets – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists of persons concerned – Proof that maintaining him on the lists was well-founded – Error of assessment – Change in the factual and legal circumstances leading to the adoption and maintenance of the restrictive measures)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0091: Case T-91/23: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2024 - Ofree v EUIPO - gamigo (gamindo) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark gamindo – Earlier EU word mark gamigo – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0094: Case T-94/23: Judgment of the General Court of 19 November 2025 – Pollinis France v Commission (Plant protection products – Active substance boscalid – Application for renewal of an active substance – Extension of approval period – Delay in the renewal procedure – Reasons beyond the control of the applicant – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Decision to reject the request – Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0095: Case T-95/23: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2025 – RWE Supply & Trading v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – ACER decision on the amendment to the methodology for pricing balancing energy – Imposition of a temporary price limit – Appeal brought before the Board of Appeal of ACER – Specific conditions and arrangements concerning actions – Article 28(1) and Article 29 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility due to lack of standing to bring an appeal before the Board of Appeal – Plea of illegality – Equality before the law and effective judicial protection – Lack of individual concern – Attributes or factual circumstances not raised – Time limit for bringing proceedings – No excusable error)

0 0

CELEX:62023TA0096: Case T-96/23: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2025 – Uniper Global Commodities v ACER (Energy – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – ACER decision on the amendment to the methodology for pricing balancing energy – Imposition of a temporary price limit – Appeal brought before the Board of Appeal of ACER – Specific conditions and arrangements concerning actions – Article 28(1) and Article 29 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility due to lack of standing to bring an appeal before the Board of Appeal – Plea of illegality – Equality before the law and effective judicial protection – Lack of individual concern – Attributes or factual circumstances not raised – Time limit for bringing proceedings – No excusable error)

RSS
First21862187218821892191219321942195Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top