oktober 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0073: Case T-73/23: Judgment of the General Court of 4 September 2024 – Tertianum v EUIPO – DPF (TERTIANUM) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark TERTIANUM – International registration of the earlier figurative mark Tertianum WOHNEN UND LEBEN IM DRITTEN ALTER – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Nature of use – Proof of genuine use)
april 02, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0074: Case T-74/23: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Oriflame Cosmetics v EUIPO — Caramé (O) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark O — Earlier international registration in respect of the figurative mark O — Relative grounds for refusal — No genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
junij 10, 2024 0 25 CELEX:62023TA0076: Case T-76/23: Judgment of the General Court of 17 April 2024 – DDP Specialty Electronic Materials US 8 v EUIPO – Taniobis (AMBERTEC)
julij 15, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0077: Case T-77/23: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Jaw de Croon v CPVO – Belgicactus (Belsemred1) (Plant varieties – Invalidity proceedings – Grant of a Community plant variety right for the variety Sempervivum Belsemred1 – Novelty of the variety – Distinctness of the variety – Article 20(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 – Articles 7 and 10 of Regulation No 2100/94 – Burden of proof – Lack of evidence)
julij 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0078: Case T-78/23: Judgment of the General Court of 12 June 2024 – Google v EUIPO – EPay (GPAY) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark GPAY – Earlier national figurative mark ePay – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
julij 15, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0079: Case T 79/23: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Chiquita Brands v EUIPO – Jara 2000 (CHIQUITA QUEEN) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark CHIQUITA QUEEN – Earlier EU figurative mark Red Queen – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
april 02, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0080: Case T-80/23: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Beauty Biosciences v EUIPO — Société de Recherche Cosmétique (BEAUTYBIO) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark BEAUTYBIO — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))
april 02, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0081: Case T-81/23: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Beauty Biosciences v EUIPO — Société de Recherche Cosmétique (BEAUTYBIO SCIENCE) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark BEAUTYBIO SCIENCE — Absolute grounds for invalidity — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))
april 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0082: Case T-82/23: Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2024 — Nextrend v EUIPO — Xiamen Axent Corporation and Axent Switzerland (Toilet units (part of –)) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing toilet units (part of — ) — Earlier Community design — Grounds for invalidity — Individual character — Different overall impression — Degree of freedom of the designer — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
november 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023TA0083: Case T-83/23: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – VP v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Members of the Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decision of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment by the applicant – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Concept of harassment – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment)