februar 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0609: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Zentiva k.s. and Zentiva Pharma GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Medicinal product for human use – Marketing authorisation – Extension of the marketing protection period – No urgency.#Case C-609/23 P(R).
december 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0609_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Zentiva k.s. and Zentiva Pharma GmbH v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Medicinal product for human use – Marketing authorisation – Extension of the marketing protection period – No urgency.#Case C-609/23 P(R).
januar 16, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0611: Ordonnance (chambre d’admission des pourvois) de la Cour du 9 janvier 2024.#Yayla Türk Lebensmittelvertrieb GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non‑admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-611/23 P. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 22, 2024 0 18 CELEX:62023CO0611_INF: Order of the Court of 9 January 2024.#Yayla Türk Lebensmittelvertrieb GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-611/23 P.
februar 07, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0614: Order of the Court of 30 January 2024.#Markus Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-614/23 P.
avgust 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0614_INF: Order of the Court of 30 January 2024.#Markus Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-614/23 P.
april 19, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0628: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 9 avril 2024.#YG et NI contre AXA Bank Europe SA e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence de présentation du contexte réglementaire du litige au principal – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour ainsi que du lien entre les dispositions du droit de l’Union dont l’interprétation est demandée et la législation nationale applicable – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-628/23. This document does not exist in English.
december 12, 2024 0 14 CELEX:62023CO0628_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 April 2024.#YG and NI v AXA Bank Europe SA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék.#Case C-628/23.
januar 07, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0634_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 11 January 2024.#BonSens.org v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Correspondence between the President of the European Commission and the chief executive officer of an undertaking – Refusal to grant access – Action for annulment – Interest in the result of the case – Association party to proceedings before national courts.#Case C-634/23 P(I).