Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CO0700:           Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 5 mars 2024.#Cayago Tec GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Dessin ou modèle communautaire – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande d’admission ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-700/23 P.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62023CO0707_INF: Order of the Court of 23 February 2024.#Breville Pty Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-707/23 P.

0 0

CELEX:62023CO0708: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 July 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, en liquidation v European Commission and Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Economic and monetary policy – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 18 – Resolution procedure – Adoption of a resolution scheme by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) – No objection from the European Commission or the Council of the European Union – Endorsement of that scheme by the European Commission – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility of the action in so far as it is directed against the Council – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-708/23 P.

0 0

CELEX:62023CO0708_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 July 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, en liquidation v European Commission and Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Economic and monetary policy – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 18 – Resolution procedure – Adoption of a resolution scheme by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) – No objection from the European Commission or the Council of the European Union – Endorsement of that scheme by the European Commission – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility of the action in so far as it is directed against the Council – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-708/23 P.

0 0

CELEX:62023CO0709: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 July 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, en liquidation v European Commission and Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Economic and monetary policy – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 18 – Resolution procedure – Adoption of a resolution scheme by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) – No objection from the European Commission or the Council of the European Union – Endorsement of that scheme by the European Commission – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility of the action in so far as it is directed against the Council – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-709/23 P.

0 0

CELEX:62023CO0709_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 July 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, en liquidation v European Commission and Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Economic and monetary policy – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM) – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 18 – Resolution procedure – Adoption of a resolution scheme by the Single Resolution Board (SRB) – No objection from the European Commission or the Council of the European Union – Endorsement of that scheme by the European Commission – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility of the action in so far as it is directed against the Council – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-709/23 P.

0 0

CELEX:62023CO0724: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 July 2024.#ATHINAÏKI ZYTHOPOIIA AE v Anexartiti Archi Dimosion Esodon.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law or admits of no reasonable doubt – Directive 92/83/EEC – Article 3(1) – Calculation of the amount of excise duty levied on beer – Method of calculating degrees Plato – Legislative amendment intended to clarify that method – Directive (EU) 2020/1151 – Article 1(1) – No effect of that directive on previously existing situations.#Case C-724/23.

RSS
First21782179218021812183218521862187Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top