januar 25, 2025 0 17 CELEX:62023CO0558_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 April 2024.#Criminal proceedings against IC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit.#Case C-558/23.
oktober 05, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0564: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 28 September 2023.#Council of the European Union v Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin.#Appeal – Interim relief – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the name of a natural person on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those measures – Suspension of the process of ‘re-listing’ that person – Publication of a note in the Official Journal of the European Union – Obligation to take measures on visas granted by Member States – Measures which may be adopted by the judge hearing the application for interim measures.#Cases C-564/23 P(R) and C-564/23 P(R)-R.
januar 06, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0565: Ordonnance de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 16 décembre 2025.#AF contre Cofidis Magyarországi Fióktelepe.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives contenues dans des contrats conclus avec des consommateurs – Prêt libellé en devise étrangère – Clause abusive mettant le risque de change à charge du consommateur – Effets de la constatation du caractère abusif d’une telle clause – Invalidité du contrat – Conséquences d’une telle invalidité – Législation nationale prévoyant une obligation pour le consommateur de demander, à titre de ces conséquences, que ce contrat soit déclaré comme étant “valide” au sens du droit national – Choix à opérer par le consommateur entre le “rétablissement de la situation antérieure” ou l This document does not exist in English.
marec 23, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0576: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 14 mars 2024.#Elite Games SRL contre Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Vaslui et Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Iaşi.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 98 – Annexe III, point 7 – Faculté pour les États membres d’appliquer un taux de TVA réduit à certaines livraisons de biens et prestations de services – Droit d’admission aux parcs d’attraction – Notion de “parcs d’attraction”.#Affaire C-576/23. This document does not exist in English.
november 08, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0585(01): Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 18 October 2023.#Council of the European Union v Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin.#Appeal – Interim relief – Application to intervene – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Application submitted by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy – Interest in the result of the case – Grant of application to intervene.#Case C-585/23 P(R).
november 29, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0585(02): Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 22 November 2023.#Council of the European Union v Nikita Dmitrievich Mazepin.#Appeal – Interim relief – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the name of a natural person on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those measures – Suspension of the process of ‘re-listing’ that person – Publication of a note in the Official Journal of the European Union – Obligation to take measures on visas granted by Member States – Measures which may be adopted by the judge hearing the application for interim measures.#Cases C-585/23 P(R) and C-585/23 P(R)-R.
februar 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0597: Order of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-597/23 P.
december 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0597_INF: Order of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-597/23 P.
februar 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0598: Order of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-598/23 P.