november 03, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0495: Order of the Court of 27 October 2023.#Wallmax Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-495/23 P.
februar 23, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0495_INF: Order of the Court of 27 October 2023.#Wallmax Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-495/23 P.
marec 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0498: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 February 2024.#AL v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Official – Remuneration – Investigation of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Family allowances – Dependent child allowances – Article 2(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Person treated as a dependent child – Person whom the official has a legal responsibility to maintain and whose maintenance involves heavy expenditure – Conditions for granting – Withdrawal of entitlement to the allowance – Recovery of overpaid sums under Article 85 of the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
december 07, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0498_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 February 2024.#AL v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Official – Remuneration – Investigation of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Family allowances – Dependent child allowances – Article 2(4) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Person treated as a dependent child – Person whom the official has a legal responsibility to maintain and whose maintenance involves heavy expenditure – Conditions for granting – Withdrawal of entitlement to the allowance – Recovery of overpaid sums under Article 85 of the Staff Regulations – Action for annulment – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfoun
januar 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0500: Order of the Court of 18 January 2024.#Groupe Canal+ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-500/23 P.
december 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0500_INF: Order of the Court of 18 January 2024.#Groupe Canal+ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-500/23 P.
november 03, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0504: Order of the Court of 27 October 2023.#Brooks England Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-504/23 P.
december 23, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0520: Order of the Court of 15 December 2023.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-520/23 P.
februar 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0520_INF: Order of the Court of 15 December 2023.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-520/23 P.
december 23, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62023CO0521: Order of the Court of 15 December 2023.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-521/23 P.