Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0650: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 October 2024.#E EAD v DW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Package tour – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 3(6) – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 14(5) – Cumulative application – Limitations – Regulation No 261/2004 – Article 3(2) – Article 4(3) – Compensation for passengers in the event of denied boarding – Passengers informed in advance of denied boarding – Incorrect information – Tour operator transferring passengers to another flight – Flight nonetheless carried out by the operating air carrier as originally planned – Operating air carrier’s obligation to provide compensation – Article 13 – Possibility of seeking reimbursement from the tour operator.#Case C-650/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0653: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#SIA „TOODE” v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Aid scheme authorised by the European Commission – Support to the economy in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid – Legal action requesting that the court before which the matter has been brought order the adoption of a beneficial administrative act ex nunc – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the time limit prescribed for granting the aid – Date on which the aid is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Article 1 – Existing

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0653_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#SIA „TOODE” v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Aid scheme authorised by the European Commission – Support to the economy in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Refusal by the competent authority to grant aid – Legal action requesting that the court before which the matter has been brought order the adoption of a beneficial administrative act ex nunc – Expiry, during the legal proceedings, of the time limit prescribed for granting the aid – Date on which the aid is deemed to have been granted – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an e

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0654: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 13(1) and (2) – Unsolicited communications – Concept of communication ‘for the purposes of direct marketing’ – Obtaining electronic contact details ‘in the context of the sale of a product or a service’ – Registration on an online platform giving access to additional content – Sending of a daily newsletter via email – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 6 – Lawfulness of p

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0654_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 13(1) and (2) – Unsolicited communications – Concept of communication ‘for the purposes of direct marketing’ – Obtaining electronic contact details ‘in the context of the sale of a product or a service’ – Registration on an online platform giving access to additional content – Sending of a daily newsletter via email – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing – Article 95 – Relationship with Directive 2002/58.#Ca

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0655: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#IP v Quirin Privatbank AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Rights of the data subject – Article 17 – Right to erasure of data – Article 18 – Right to restriction of processing – Article 79 – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Unlawful processing of personal data – Action seeking an order requiring the controller to refrain from any further unlawful processing in the future – Basis – Conditions – Article 82(1) – Right to compensation – Concept of ‘non-material damage’ – Assessment of the compensation – Possible consideration of the degree of fault on the part of the controller – Possible impact of t

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0655_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 4 septembre 2025.#IP contre Quirin Privatbank AG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des personnes physiques à l’égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel – Règlement (UE) 2016/679 – Droits de la personne concernée – Article 17 – Droit à l’effacement de données – Article 18 – Droit à la limitation du traitement – Article 79 – Droit à un recours juridictionnel effectif – Traitement illicite de données à caractère personnel – Recours tendant à enjoindre au responsable du traitement de s’abstenir de procéder à l’avenir à tout nouveau traitement illicite – Fondement – Conditions – Article 82, paragraphe 1 – Droit à réparation – Notion de “dommage moral” – Évaluation de la réparation – Prise en compte éventuelle

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0657: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2025.#M. K. v Ministerstvo zemědělství.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy (CAP) – Financing, management and monitoring of the CAP – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Financing by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Article 54 – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Article 3 – Recovery of amounts wrongly paid of a grant – Limitation period – Indicative time limit.#Case C-657/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0657_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2025.#M. K. v Ministerstvo zemědělství.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy (CAP) – Financing, management and monitoring of the CAP – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Financing by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Article 54 – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Article 3 – Recovery of amounts wrongly paid of a grant – Limitation period – Indicative time limit.#Case C-657/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0662: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v X.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 4(1) and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) – Procedures for granting international protection – Extension by the determining authority of the six-month examination period – Large number of applications for international protection lodged simultaneously – Concept – Consideration of other circumstances.#Case C-662/23.

RSS
First20672068206920702072207420752076Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top