Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0642: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 January 2025.#Flightright GmbH v Etihad Airways P.J.S.C.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 8(1)(a) – Right to reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Choice between reimbursement in money or in travel vouchers – Article 7(3) – Concept of the ‘signed agreement of the passenger’ – Loyalty account set up by the passenger on the air carrier’s website.#Case C-642/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0642_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 January 2025.#Flightright GmbH v Etihad Airways P.J.S.C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 8(1)(a) – Right to reimbursement of the cost of the airline ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Choice between reimbursement in money or in travel vouchers – Article 7(3) – Concept of the ‘signed agreement of the passenger’ – Loyalty account set up by the passenger on the air carrier’s website.#Case C-642/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0644: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 January 2025.#Sofiyska gradska prokuratura v IR.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8 – Right to be present at the trial – Information regarding the holding of the trial and the consequences of non-appearance – Inability to locate the accused person notwithstanding the reasonable efforts of the competent authorities – Possibility of a trial and a decision in absentia – Article 9 – Right to a new trial or to another legal remedy which allows a fresh determination of the merits of the case – No such right where the person concerned absconds.#Case C-644/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0644_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 January 2025.#Criminal proceedings against IR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Article 8 – Right to be present at the trial – Information regarding the holding of the trial and the consequences of non-appearance – Inability to locate the accused person notwithstanding the reasonable efforts of the competent authorities – Possibility of a trial and a decision in absentia – Article 9 – Right to a new trial or to another legal remedy which allows a fresh determination of the merits of the case – No such right where the person concerned absconds.#Case C-644/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0645: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Hera Comm SpA v Falconeri Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 1(2) – Other indirect taxes on excise goods – Electricity – National legislation establishing a tax additional to the excise duty on electricity – No specific purposes – Additional tax for the benefit of regional and local authorities considered by the national courts to be contrary to Directive 2008/118 – Recovery by the final consumer from the supplier of the tax paid but not due.#Case C-645/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0645_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Hera Comm SpA v Falconeri Srl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Bologna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 1(2) – Other indirect taxes on excise goods – Electricity – National legislation establishing a tax additional to the excise duty on electricity – No specific purposes – Additional tax for the benefit of regional and local authorities considered by the national courts to be contrary to Directive 2008/118 – Recovery by the final consumer from the supplier of the tax paid but not due.#Case C-645/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0646: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Criminal proceedings against P.B. and R.S.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Independence of the judiciary – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection in areas covered by EU law – Principle of irremovability of judges – Military judge found unfit for professional military service – National legislation requiring the early retirement of that judge.#Joined Cases C-646/23 and C-661/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0646_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Criminal proceedings against P.B. and R.S.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Independence of the judiciary – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection in areas covered by EU law – Principle of irremovability of judges – Military judge found unfit for professional military service – National legislation requiring the early retirement of that judge.#Joined Cases C-646/23 and C-661/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0649: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Institutul de Istorie şi Teorie Literară „G. Călinescu” and Fundaţia Naţională pentru Ştiinţă şi Artă v HK, en qualité d'héritier de TB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2001/29/EC – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Reproduction right – Article 2(a) – Concept of a ‘work’ – Protection of works by copyright – Conditions – Directive 2006/116/EC – Article 5 – Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works – Article 2 – Critical edition of a pre-existing work the purpose of which is to restore a Latin manuscript – Intellectual creation reflecting the personality of its author, by expressing th

RSS
First20662067206820692071207320742075Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top