Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 3

CELEX:62021CO0475_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 8 December 2021.#Franz Schröder GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-475/21 P.

0 0

CELEX:62021CO0480: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 July 2022.#W O and J L v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Surrender procedure between Member States – Conditions for execution – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Systemic or generalised deficiencies – Two-step examination – Criteria for application – Obligation of the executing judicial authority to determine, specifically and precisely, whether there

0 0

CELEX:62021CO0480_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 July 2022.#W O and J L v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supreme Court.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 1(3) – Surrender procedure between Member States – Conditions for execution – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Systemic or generalised deficiencies – Two-step examination – Criteria for application – Obligation of the executing judicial autho

0 3

CELEX:62021CO0483_INF: Order of the Court of 30 November 2021.#Health Product Group sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-483/21 P.

0 3

CELEX:62021CO0493: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 March 2022.#Criminal proceedings against K.M.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 – Control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy – Article 89 – Measures to ensure compliance – Article 90 – Criminal sanctions – Principle of proportionality – Interpretation of the judgment of 11 February 2021, K. M. (Sanctions imposed on the master of a vessel) (C‑77/20, EU:C:2021:112).#Case C-493/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CO0493_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 March 2022.#Criminal proceedings against K.M.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 – Control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy – Article 89 – Measures to ensure compliance – Article 90 – Criminal sanctions – Principle of proportionality – Interpretation of the judgment of 11 February 2021, K. M. (Sanctions imposed on the master of a vessel) (C‑77/20, EU:C:2021:112).#Case C-493/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CO0503:           Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 22 mars 2022.#Bálint Krátky contre Parlement européen e.a.#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Protection des consommateurs – Contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Prêt hypothécaire indexé sur une devise étrangère – Prétendu défaut, de la part du Parlement européen, du Conseil de l’Union européenne et de la Commission européenne, d’arrêter les mesures visées à l’article 169, paragraphe 2, sous b), TFUE – Recours en indemnité – Lien de causalité – Absence – Pourvoi manifestement non fondé.#Affaire C-503/21 P.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First12051206120712081210121212131214Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top