januar 24, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0379: Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 17 janvier 2023.#Procédure engagée par TBI Bank EAD.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Crédit à la consommation – Directive 93/13/CEE – Article 6, paragraphe 1 – Clauses abusives – Refus de délivrance d’une injonction de payer immédiate en cas de prétention fondée sur une clause abusive – Conséquences relatives au caractère abusif d’une clause contractuelle – Instructions d’une juridiction supérieure ne respectant pas lesdites conséquences.#Affaire C-379/21. This document does not exist in English.
februar 22, 2023 0 84 CELEX:62021CO0379_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 January 2023.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Case C-379/21.
marec 15, 2022 0 3 CELEX:62021CO0381_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 November 2021.#Keun Jig Lee v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-381/21 P.
marec 22, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0387_INF: Order of the Court of 13 December 2021.#Asolo LTD and WeMO Brands BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-387/21 P.
februar 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0400_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 January 2022.#Asociaţia Naţională de Terapii Complementare din România (ANATECOR) v Primăria Municipiului Arad - Direcţia Venituri and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Arad.#Case C-400/21.
marec 11, 2022 0 200 CELEX:62021CO0415_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 10 November 2021.#Comercializadora Eloro SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-415/21 P.
maj 06, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0420: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 April 2022.#Valvis Holding SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – EU trade mark – Appeal brought by a party which was not unsuccessful in its submissions at first instance – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-420/21 P.
julij 12, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0420_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 April 2022.#Valvis Holding SA v Sun Stars & Sons Pte Ltd and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – EU trade mark – Appeal brought by a party which was not unsuccessful in its submissions at first instance – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-420/21 P.
marec 14, 2022 0 3 CELEX:62021CO0424_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 November 2021.#Sun Stars & Sons Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-424/21 P.
marec 14, 2022 0 3 CELEX:62021CO0425_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 11 November 2021.#Sun Stars & Sons Pte Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-425/21 P.