marec 02, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0327_INF: Order of the Court of 26 November 2021.#Giro Travel Company SRL v Andréas Stihl AG & Co. KG and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-327/21 P.
januar 20, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0341: Beschluss des Gerichtshofs (Achte Kammer) vom 22. Dezember 2022.#Europäische Kommission gegen KM, Europäisches Parlament und Rat der Europäischen Union und Rat der Europäischen Union gegen KM, Europäische Kommission und Europäisches Parlament.#Rechtsmittel – Art. 182 der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs – Öffentlicher Dienst – Ruhegehalt – Statut der Beamten der Europäischen Union – Art. 20 des Anhangs VIII – Gewährung einer Hinterbliebenenversorgung – Überlebender Ehegatte eines ehemaligen Beamten, der ein Ruhegehalt bezog – Nach dem Ausscheiden dieses Beamten aus dem Dienst geschlossene Ehe – Voraussetzung einer Mindestehedauer von fünf Jahren zum Zeitpunkt des Todes des Beamten – Art. 18 des Anhangs VIII – Vor dem Ausscheiden des Beamten aus dem Dienst ge This document does not exist in English.
februar 16, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0345_INF: Order of the Court of 23 November 2021.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Whether appeals may be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Court’s Rules of Procedure – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-345/21 P.
maj 12, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0346: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 5 mai 2022.#ING Luxembourg SA contre VX.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile et commerciale – Signification et notification des actes judiciaires et extrajudiciaires – Règlement (CE) no 1393/2007 – Article 8 – Information du destinataire, au moyen du formulaire type figurant à l’annexe II de ce règlement, de son droit de refuser la réception d’un acte judiciaire qui n’est pas rédigé ou accompagné d’une traduction dans une langue comprise du destinataire ou dans la langue ou l’une des langues officielles de l’État membre requis – Absence d’utilisation du formulaire type – Conséquences.#Affaire C-346/21. This document does not exist in English.
julij 13, 2022 0 157 CELEX:62021CO0346_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 May 2022.#ING Luxembourg SA v VX.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto.#Case C-346/21.
marec 11, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0360_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 October 2021.#FCA Italy SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-360/21 P.
marec 11, 2022 0 201 CELEX:62021CO0369_INF: Order of the Court of 22 September 2021.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-369/21 P.
februar 16, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0373_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 1 December 2021.#Hasbro Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-373/21 P.
november 03, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0374: Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 20 octobre 2022.#Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) contre AB e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Règlement (CE, Euratom) no 2988/95 – Ressources propres de l’Union européenne – Protection des intérêts financiers de l’Union – Poursuites d’irrégularités – Article 4 – Adoption de mesures administratives – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Délai de prescription des poursuites – Expiration – Invocabilité dans le cadre de la procédure de recouvrement forcé – Article 3, paragraphe 2 – Délai d’exécution – Applicabilité – Point de départ – Interruption et suspension.#Affaire C-374/21. This document does not exist in English.
marec 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CO0374_SUM: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) v AB and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Own resources of the European Union – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Proceedings relating to irregularities – Article 4 – Adoption of administrative measures – Article 3(1) – Limitation period for proceedings – Expiry – Whether it may be relied on in the context of the enforced recovery procedure – Article 3(2) – Period for implementation – Applicability – Starting point of the limitation period – Interruption and suspension.#Case C-374/21.