Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0410_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2023.#Criminal proceedings against FU and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie.#References for a preliminary ruling – Migrant workers – Social security – Legislation applicable – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 5 – A1 certificate – Provisional withdrawal – Binding effect – Certificate fraudulently obtained or relied on – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 13(1)(b)(i) – Persons normally pursuing an activity as an employed person in two or more Member States – Applicability of the legislation of the Member State in which the registered office is situated – Concept of ‘registered office’ – Undertaking which has obtained a Community licence for transport under Regulation (EC) No 107

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0411: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 October 2022.#Instituto do Cinema e do Audiovisual, I.P. v NOWO Communications, S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Services consisting in the creation and production of cinematographic and audiovisual works – Operators of subscription television services – Subscription fee payable by subscription television operators – Allocation of the revenue from the fee – Restriction – Effects too uncertain or too indirect.#Case C-411/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0412: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 March 2023.#Dual Prod SRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca - Comisia regională pentru autorizarea operatorilor de produse supuse accizelor armonizate.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duties – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 16(1) – Authorisation to operate as a tax warehouse for products subject to excise duty – Successive suspension measures – Whether criminal in nature – Articles 48 and 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of the presumption of innocence – Principle ne bis in idem – Proportionality.#Case C-412/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0413: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 April 2023.#Council of the European Union v Aisha Muammer Mohamed El-Qaddafi.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – Retention of Ms El-Qaddafi’s name on the lists – Sufficiently solid factual basis – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-413/21 P.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0413_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 April 2023.#Council of the European Union v Aisha Muammer Mohamed El-Qaddafi.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya – List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union – Retention of Ms El-Qaddafi’s name on the lists – Sufficiently solid factual basis – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-413/21 P.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0416: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 September 2022.#Landkreis A.-F. v J. Sch. Omnibusunternehmen and K. Reisen GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement procedures – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 57(4), first subparagraph, point (d) – Optional grounds for exclusion – Agreements with other economic operators aimed at distorting competition – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 36(1) – Principles of proportionality and equal treatment of tenderers – Article 80(1) – Use of exclusion grounds and selection criteria provided for under Directive 2014/24/EU – Tenderers which constitute an economic unit and have submitted separate tenders that were neither autonomous nor independent – Need for sufficiently plausible indications to establish an infringemen

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0418:           Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 27 octobre 2022.#Orthomol pharmazeutische Vertriebs GmbH contre Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité des aliments – Denrées alimentaires – Règlement (UE) no 609/2013 – Article 2, paragraphe 2, sous g) – Règlement délégué (UE) 2016/128 – Denrée alimentaire destinée à des fins médicales spéciales – Autres exigences nutritionnelles particulières – Denrées alimentaires procurant un bénéfice général au patient – Délimitation par rapport aux médicaments.#Affaire C-418/21.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0419: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 December 2022.#X sp. z o.o., sp. k. v Z.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/7/EU – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Article 2(1) – Concept of ‘commercial transactions’ – Compensation for recovery costs incurred by the creditor due to late payment by the debtor – Article 6 – Fixed minimum sum of EUR 40 – Several late payments for supplies of goods or services under a single contract.#Case C-419/21.

RSS
First11341135113611371139114111421143Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top