februar 26, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0372_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 February 2023.#Freikirche der Siebenten-Tags-Adventisten in Deutschland KdöR v Bildungsdirektion für Vorarlberg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Status under EU law of churches and religious associations or communities in the Member States – Article 17(1) TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 49 TFEU – Restrictions – Justification – Proportionality – Subsidies for a private school – Application submitted by a religious society established in another Member State – Establishment recognised by that society as a denominational school.#Case C-372/21.
marec 09, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0375: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#Sdruzhenie „Za Zemyata – dostap do pravosadie“ and Others v Izpalnitelen director na Izpalnitelna agentsia po okolna sreda and „TETS Maritsa iztok 2“ EAD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Ambient air quality – Directive 2008/50/EC – Articles 13 and 23 – Limit values for the protection of human health – Exceedance – Air quality plan – Directive 2010/75/EU – Integrated pollution prevention and control – Update of a permit to operate a power plant – Emission limit values – Article 15(4) – Application for a derogation setting less strict emission limit values – Significant pollution – Article 18 – Compliance with environmental quality standards – Obligations of the competent authority.#Case C-375/21.
junij 16, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0376: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#Zamestnik-ministar na regionalnoto razvitie i blagoustroystvoto i rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa „Regioni v rastezh“ 2014-2020 v Obshtina Razlog.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 – Inapplicability to public contracts awarded by Member States and financed by resources from the European Structural and Investment Funds – Directive 2014/24/EU – Direct and unconditional reference to provisions of EU law in national legislation – Applicability to a contract whose estimated value is lower than the threshold set in the directive – Article 32(2)(a) – Option for a contracting authority to invite only
julij 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0377: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Siebte Kammer) vom 7. Juli 2022.#Ville de Mons und Zone de secours Hainaut - Centre gegen RM.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Sozialpolitik – Richtlinie 97/81/EG – Rahmenvereinbarung über Teilzeitarbeit – Paragraf 4 – Diskriminierungsverbot – Pro-rata-temporis-Grundsatz – Berücksichtigung des von einem vollzeitbeschäftigten Mitglied der Berufsfeuerwehr als Mitglied der freiwilligen Feuerwehr erreichten Dienstalters bei der Berechnung seiner Vergütung nach dem Pro-rata-temporis-Grundsatz.#Rechtssache C-377/21. This document does not exist in English.
maj 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0377_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 July 2022.#Ville de Mons and Zone de secours Hainaut - Centre v RM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 97/81/EC – Framework Agreement on part-time work – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Principle of pro rata temporis – Taking into account, for the purposes of calculating the remuneration of a full-time professional firefighter, the length of service for remuneration purposes which he has acquired as a volunteer firefighter, in accordance with the principle of pro rata temporis.#Case C-377/21.
december 08, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0378: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#P GmbH v Finanzamt Österreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 203 – Adjustment of the VAT return – Recipients of services who not entitled to make deductions – No risk of loss of tax revenue.#Case C-378/21.
februar 28, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0382: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 February 2024.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR.#Appeal – Intellectual property – Community designs – Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) – Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights – Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property – Article 4 – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 41 – Application for registration of a Community design – Right of priority – Priority claim based on an international application filed under the PCT – Time period – Interpretation consistent with Article 4 of that convention – Limits.#Case C-382/21 P.
maj 25, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0382_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 February 2024.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR.#Appeal – Intellectual property – Community designs – Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) – Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights – Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property – Article 4 – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 41 – Application for registration of a Community design – Right of priority – Priority claim based on an international application filed under the PCT – Time period – Interpretation consistent with Article 4 of that convention – Limits.#Case C-382/21 P.
december 22, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0383: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Fünfte Kammer) vom 22. Dezember 2022.#Société de logement de service public (SLSP) “Sambre & Biesme” SCRL gegen Société wallonne du logement.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Öffentliche Aufträge – Richtlinie 2014/24/EU – Vergabe eines öffentlichen Auftrags ohne Einleitung eines Ausschreibungsverfahrens – Öffentliche Aufträge zwischen Einrichtungen des öffentlichen Sektors – Art. 12 Abs. 3 – Öffentliche Aufträge, die ‚inhouse‘ vergeben werden – Begriff ‚ähnliche Kontrolle‘ – Voraussetzungen – Vertretung aller beteiligten öffentlichen Auftraggeber – Art. 12 Abs. 4 – Vertrag zwischen öffentlichen Auftraggebern, die gemeinsame Ziele von öffentlichem Interesse verfolgen – Begriff ‚Zusammenarbeit‘ – Voraussetzungen – Nicht fristgerechte Umse This document does not exist in English.
november 10, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0385: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 November 2022.#Zenith Media Communications SRL v Consiliul Concurenţei.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101 TFEU – Penalty imposed by the national competition authority – Determination of the amount of the fine – Consideration of turnover in the profit and loss account – Request for the national competition authority to take into account a different turnover – Refusal by the Competition Council – Real situation of the undertaking concerned – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-385/21.