Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0279: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#X v Udlændingenævnet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EEC-Turkey Association Agreement – Article 9 – Decision No 1/80 – Article 10(1) – Article 13 – Standstill clause – Family reunification – National rule introducing new more restrictive conditions in the area of family reunification for spouses of Turkish nationals who hold a permanent residence permit in the Member State concerned – Requirement that Turkish workers successfully take a test demonstrating a certain level of knowledge of the official language of that Member State – Justification – Objective of ensuring successful integration.#Case C-279/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0279_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#X v Udlændingenævnet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EEC-Turkey Association Agreement – Article 9 – Decision No 1/80 – Article 10(1) – Article 13 – Standstill clause – Family reunification – National rule introducing new more restrictive conditions in the area of family reunification for spouses of Turkish nationals who hold a permanent residence permit in the Member State concerned – Requirement that Turkish workers successfully take a test demonstrating a certain level of knowledge of the official language of that Member State – Justification – Objective of ensuring successful integration.#Case C-279/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0280: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#P.I. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Eligibility for refugee status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 10(1)(e) and (2) – Reasons for persecution – Concepts of ‘political opinion’ and ‘attributed political opinion’ – Attempts by an applicant for asylum to defend himself, in his country of origin, by legal means against non-State actors acting illegally and in a position to exploit the mechanism by which that State imposes penalties for criminal offences.#Case C-280/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0280_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 January 2023.#P.I. v Migracijos departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos vidaus reikalų ministerijos.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Eligibility for refugee status – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 10(1)(e) and (2) – Reasons for persecution – Concepts of ‘political opinion’ and ‘attributed political opinion’ – Attempts by an applicant for asylum to defend himself, in his country of origin, by legal means against non-State actors acting illegally and in a position to exploit the mechanism by which that State imposes penalties for criminal offences.#Case C-280/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0283: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#VA v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security for migrant workers – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 44(2) – Scope – Pension for total incapacity for work – Calculation – Taking into account of child raising-periods completed in another Member State – Applicability – Article 21 TFEU – Free movement of citizens – Sufficient link between those child-raising periods and the periods of insurance completed in the Member State responsible for payment of the pension.#Case C-283/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0283_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#VA v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security for migrant workers – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 44(2) – Scope – Pension for total incapacity for work – Calculation – Taking into account of child raising-periods completed in another Member State – Applicability – Article 21 TFEU – Free movement of citizens – Sufficient link between those child-raising periods and the periods of insurance completed in the Member State responsible for payment of the pension.#Case C-283/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0284: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 31 January 2023.#European Commission v Anthony Braesch and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Restructuring aid – Banking sector – Preliminary examination stage – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Restructuring plan – Commitments given by the Member State concerned – Burden-sharing measures – Conversion of subordinated debts into equity – Bondholders – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi – Natural or legal person directly and individually concerned – Breach of the procedural rights of interested parties – Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Article 108(2) TFEU – Concept of ‘parties concerned’ – Regulatio

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0284_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 31 January 2023.#European Commission v Anthony Braesch and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Restructuring aid – Banking sector – Preliminary examination stage – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Restructuring plan – Commitments given by the Member State concerned – Burden-sharing measures – Conversion of subordinated debts into equity – Bondholders – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi – Natural or legal person directly and individually concerned – Breach of the procedural rights of interested parties – Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure – Article 108(2) TFEU – Concept of ‘parties concerned’ – Regul

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0286:           Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 28 avril 2022.#Commission européenne contre République française.#Manquement d’État – Environnement – Directive 2008/50/CE – Qualité de l’air ambiant – Article 13, paragraphe 1, et annexe XI – Dépassement systématique et persistant des valeurs limites fixées pour les microparticules (PM10) dans certaines zones de France – Article 23, paragraphe 1 – Annexe XV – Période de dépassement “la plus courte possible” – Mesures appropriées.#Affaire C-286/21.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First11211122112311241126112811291130Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top