april 21, 2023 0 97 CELEX:62021CJ0246_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#European Parliament v Giulia Moi.#Case C-246/21 P.
december 08, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0247: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#Luxury Trust Automobil GmbH v Finanzamt Österreich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 42(a) – Article 197(1)(c) – Article 226(11a) – Article 141 – Exemption – Triangular transaction – Designation of the final recipient of a supply as being liable for VAT – Invoicing – Reference to ‘Reverse charge’ – Mandatory – Omission of that reference on an invoice – Retroactive correction of the invoice.#Case C-247/21.
april 07, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0249: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Fuhrmann-2-GmbH v B.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Article 8(2) – Distance contracts concluded by electronic means – Information requirements for the trader – Activation of a button or a similar function in order to place the order with an obligation to pay – Unambiguous formulation corresponding to the words ‘order with obligation to pay’ – Taking account only of the words on the button or similar function for the purposes of assessing the ‘corresponding’ nature of such a formulation.#Case C-249/21.
april 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0249_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Fuhrmann-2-GmbH v B.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Article 8(2) – Distance contracts concluded by electronic means – Information requirements for the trader – Activation of a button or a similar function in order to place the order with an obligation to pay – Unambiguous formulation corresponding to the words ‘order with obligation to pay’ – Taking account only of the words on the button or similar function for the purposes of assessing the ‘corresponding’ nature of such a formulation.#Case C-249/21.
oktober 06, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0250: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 October 2022.#Szef Krajowej Administracji Skarbowej v O. Fundusz Inwestycyjny Zamknięty reprezentowany przez O S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Supply of services for consideration – Exemptions – Article 135(1)(b) – Granting of credit – Sub-participation agreement.#Case C-250/21.
april 28, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0251: Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 28 avril 2022.#„Piltenes meži” SIA contre Lauku atbalsta dienests.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fonds européen agricole pour le développement rural (Feader) – Règlement (UE) no 1305/2013 – Soutien au développement rural par le Feader – Article 30 – Paiements au titre de Natura 2000 – Champ d’application – Demande d’aide au titre d’une microréserve créée dans une forêt ne faisant pas partie du réseau Natura 2000, dans le but de contribuer à assurer la protection d’une espèce d’oiseau sauvage – Règlement (UE) no 702/2014 – Exemption par catégorie de certaines aides aux secteurs agricole et forestier – Application aux aides cofinancées au moyen de ressources de l’Union européenne – Non-application aux entreprises en difficulté.#Affa This document does not exist in English.
april 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0251_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 April 2022.#'Piltenes meži' SIA v Lauku atbalsta dienests.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 – Support for rural development by the EAFRD – Article 30 – Natura 2000 payments – Scope – Application for aid in respect of a micro-reserve created in a forest that is not part of the Natura 2000 network, with the purpose of protecting a species of wild bird – Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 – Block exemption for certain types of aid to the agriculture and forestry sectors – Application to aid co-financed by means of EU resources – No application to undertakings in difficulty.#Case C-251/21.
julij 04, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0252: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 July 2023.#Meta Platforms Inc., anciennement Facebook Inc. and Others v Bundeskartellamt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Social networks – Abuse of a dominant position by the operator of such a network – Abuse which entails the processing of the personal data of the users of that network as provided for in its general terms of use – Powers of a competition authority of a Member State to find that processing is not consistent with that regulation – Reconciliation with the powers of the national data protection supervisory authorities – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Points (a) to (f) of the first
julij 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0252_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 July 2023.#Meta Platforms Inc and Others v Bundeskartellamt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Social networks – Abuse of a dominant position by the operator of such a network – Abuse which entails the processing of the personal data of the users of that network as provided for in its general terms of use – Powers of a competition authority of a Member State to find that processing is not consistent with that regulation – Reconciliation with the powers of the national data protection supervisory authorities – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincer
januar 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0255: Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 30 janvier 2024.#Reti Televisive Italiane SpA (RTI) contre Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 2010/13/UE – Services de médias audiovisuels – Article 23, paragraphes 1 et 2 – Limites imposées au temps de diffusion horaire de publicité télévisée – Dérogations – Notion de “messages diffusés par l’organisme de radiodiffusion télévisuelle en ce qui concerne ses propres programmes” – Messages diffusés par un tel organisme afin de promouvoir les émissions d’une station de radio appartenant au même groupe de radiodiffusion que cet organisme.#Affaire C-255/21. This document does not exist in English.