november 30, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0228: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 30 November 2023.#Ministero dell’Interno, Dipartimento per le Libertà civili e l'Immigrazione – Unità Dublino and Others v CZA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Articles 3 to 5, 17 and 27 – Regulation (EU) No 603/2013 – Article 29 – Regulation (EU) No 1560/2003 – Annex X – Right to information of the applicant for international protection – Common leaflet – Personal interview – Application for international protection previously lodged in a first Member State – New application lodged in a second Member State – Illegal stay in the second Member State – Take back procedure – Infringement of the right to information – No personal interview – Protection against the risk of
junij 16, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0229: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Fünfte Kammer) vom 16. Juni 2022.#Port de Bruxelles und Région de Bruxelles-Capitale gegen Infrabel SA.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Transeuropäisches Verkehrsnetz Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1315/2013 Art. 15 Abs. 1 Binnenschifffahrtsinfrastruktur – Binnenhäfen Verpflichtung eines Mitgliedstaats, Binnenhäfen an die Straßen- und Schienenverkehrsinfrastrukturen anzubinden Beseitigung der Verbindung zu einer dieser beiden Arten von Verkehrsinfrastrukturen Voraussetzungen.#Rechtssache C-229/21. This document does not exist in English.
november 17, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0230: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 November 2022.#X agissant en son nom propre et en sa capacité juridique représentante de ses enfants mineurs Y et Z v Belgische Staat.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Directive 2003/86/EC – Article 2(f) – Article 10(3)(a) – Concept of ‘unaccompanied minor’ – Right to family reunification – Refugee minor who is married at the time of her entry into the territory of a Member State – Child marriage not recognised in that Member State – Cohabitation with the spouse lawfully residing in that Member State.#Case C-230/21.
marec 31, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0231: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#IA v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Dublin system – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 29(2) – Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Six-month time limit for transfer – Possibility of extending that time limit up to a maximum of one year in the event of imprisonment – Definition of ‘imprisonment’ – Court-authorised non-voluntary committal of the asylum seeker to a hospital psychiatric department.#Case C-231/21.
april 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0231_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 March 2022.#IA v Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Dublin system – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 29(2) – Transfer of the asylum seeker to the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Six-month time limit for transfer – Possibility of extending that time limit up to a maximum of one year in the event of imprisonment – Definition of ‘imprisonment’ – Court-authorised non-voluntary committal of the asylum seeker to a hospital psychiatric department.#Case C-231/21.
marec 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0234: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 March 2024.#Défense Active des Amateurs d’Armes ASBL and Others v Conseil des ministres.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 91/477/EEC – Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons – Firearms prohibited or subject to authorisation – Semi-automatic firearms – Directive 91/477, as amended by Directive (EU) 2017/853 – Article 7(4a) – Power of Member States to confirm, renew or prolong authorisations – Presumed impossibility of using that power in respect of semi-automatic firearms converted to fire blanks or into salute or acoustic weapons – Validity – Article 17(1) and Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of the protection of legitima
maj 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0234_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 March 2024.#Défense Active des Amateurs d’Armes ASBL and Others v Conseil des ministres.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 91/477/EEC – Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons – Firearms prohibited or subject to authorisation – Semi-automatic firearms – Directive 91/477, as amended by Directive (EU) 2017/853 – Article 7(4a) – Power of Member States to confirm, renew or prolong authorisations – Presumed impossibility of using that power in respect of semi-automatic firearms converted to fire blanks or into salute or acoustic weapons – Validity – Article 17(1) and Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental
september 29, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0235: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2022.#RAIFFEISEN LEASING, trgovina in leasing d. o. o. v Republika Slovenija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 203 – Sale-and-lease back agreement – Persons liable for payment of VAT – Possibility of treating a written contractual agreement as an invoice.#Case C-235/21.
april 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0235_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2022.#Raiffeisen Leasing v Republika Slovenija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 203 – Sale-and-lease back agreement – Persons liable for payment of VAT – Possibility of treating a written contractual agreement as an invoice.#Case C-235/21.
december 22, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0237: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Generalstaatsanwaltschaft München v S.M.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Request sent to a Member State by a third State for the extradition of a Union citizen who is a national of another Member State and who has exercised his right to free movement in the first of those Member States – Request made for the purpose of enforcing a custodial sentence – Prohibition on extradition applied solely to own nationals – Restriction of freedom of movement – Justification based on the prevention of impunity – Proportionality.#Case C-237/21.