Admin MPS / ponedeljek, 19. september 2022 / Categories: Praksa Sodišča EU (DAVKI) CELEX:62021CB0685: Case C-685/21: Order of the President of the Court of 30 March 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — YV v Stadtverkehr Lindau (B) GmbH CELEX:62021CB0669: Case C-669/21, Gencoal: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 November 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto — Juízo Central Cível da Póvoa de Varzim — Portugal) — Gencoal S.A. v Conceito Norte — Consultadoria de Gestão, Lda., BT (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling — Absence of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility) CELEX:62021CB0690: Case C-690/21, RSD Reise Service Deutschland: Order of the President of the Court of 5 July 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I — Germany) — RSD Reise Service Deutschland GmbH v QL Print 132 Tags: Lex Alerts Related articles CELEX:62026TN0069: Case T-69/26: Action brought on 2 February 2026 – Oxxo v EUIPO – Ferrarelli (XOXO) CELEX:62026TN0024: Case T-24/26: Action brought on 14 January 2026 – Cerami v Commission CELEX:62025CB0293: Case C-293/25, Moguchev: Order of the Court (Eight Chamber) of 18 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad – Sofia – Bulgaria) – in the proceedings relating to the execution of the European arrest warrant issued against RT (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Question the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of execution of a custodial sentence – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Article 8(1) – Re CELEX:62024CB0814: Case C- C-814/24, Alexion Pharma Germany: Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 19 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I – Germany) – Alexion Pharma Germany GmbH v Amgen Technology (Ireland) Unlimited Company, AMGEN GmbH CELEX:62025TA0134: Case T-134/25, D (Air traffic management decision): Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 21 January 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie – Poland) – D S.A. v P S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Compensation to passengers in the event of a long delay or cancellation of a flight – Exemption – Extraordinary circumstances – Article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Air traffic management decision – Allocation of delayed departure slots due to adverse weather conditions – Possibility of relying on a flight subsequent to that affected by the occurrence of an extraordinary circumstance) CELEX:62025CN0665: Case C-665/25 P: Appeal brought on 6 October 2025 by Josep Francesc Gómez Jiménez, María del Roser García Núñez and Alba Gómez García against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 21 July 2025 in Case T-445/24, Gómez Jiménez and Others v EUIPO CELEX:62026CN0058: Case C-58/26: Action brought on 4 February 2026 – European Commission v Portuguese Republic CELEX:62025TN0876: Case T-876/25: Action brought on 19 December 2025 – Raja v Commission CELEX:62025CB0304: Case C-304/25, Lidl Bulgaria: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad – Bulgaria) – Lidl Bulgaria EOOD and KO KD v Nachalnik na otdel Operativni deynosti v GD Fiskalen kontrol v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the relationship between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient details – Manifest inadmissibility) CELEX:62025CB0124: Case C-124/25, Jawowicz: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Warszawie – Poland) – VA v BNP Paribas Bank Polska S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 100(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Dispute in the main proceedings which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate) CELEX:62025CB0553: Joined Cases C-553/25 and C-558/25, Volkswagen and Audi: Order of the President of the Court of 19 December 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Salzburg – Austria) – TF (C-553/25), MO (C 558/25) v Volkswagen AG (C-553/25), Audi AG (C-558/25) CELEX:62026TN0053: Case T-53/26, Central Europe Mark: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud (Czech Republic) made on 7 January 2026 – Central Europe Mark s.r.o. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství CELEX:62023CA0271: Case C-271/23: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 January 2026 – European Commission v Hungary (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Admissibility – Decision (EU) 2021/3 – Position to be taken, on behalf of the European Union, at the reconvened sixty-third session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, established by the United Nations Economic and Social Council, on the scheduling of cannabis and cannabis-related substances under the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, and the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 – Position and vote of a Member State, both being contrary to that position of the European Union – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Effects of the al CELEX:62024CB0028: Joined Cases C-28/24 to C-31/24, LEAL Lega Antivivisezionista – II: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 December 2025 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale regionale di giustizia amministrativa della Regione autonoma Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol – Italy) – LEAL Lega Antivivisezionista ODV and Others v Provincia autonoma di Trento, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA) (References for a preliminary ruling – Disputes in the main proceedings which have become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate) CELEX:62025TA0046: Case T-46/25: Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2026 Land Oberösterreich v EUIPO – Norma (Genussländer) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Genussländer – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark) CELEX:62025CN0846: Case C-846/25, Ligue des droits humains: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Belgium) lodged on 17 December 2025 – Ligue des droits humains ASBL v Premier ministre CELEX:62026TN0080: Case T-80/26: Action brought on 5 February 2026 – Szivos v EUIPO – Szőnyi (Slabs) CELEX:62025TA0131: Case T-131/25: Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2026 – ABB Asea Brown Boveri v EUIPO (EcoGuard) (EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark EcoGuard – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) CELEX:62025CB0226: Case C-226/25, VR Bank: Order of the President of the Court of 16 December 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg – Germany) – UR, VM v VR Bank Bodensee-Oberschwaben eG CELEX:62025CN0816: Case C-816/25, Korventus: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Politierechtbank Oost-Vlaanderen (Belgium) lodged on 12 December 2025 – Criminal proceedings against DS, Mantra BV Comments are only visible to subscribers.