december 22, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0288: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Sechste Kammer) vom 22. Dezember 2022.#Universität Koblenz-Landau gegen Europäische Exekutivagentur für Bildung und Kultur.#Rechtsmittel – Schiedsklausel – Tempus‑IV-Programme – Finanzhilfevereinbarungen Ecesis, Diusas und Deque – Systembedingte und immer wiederkehrende Unregelmäßigkeiten – Vollständige Rückforderung der ausgezahlten Beträge – Anspruch auf rechtliches Gehör – Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit – Grundsatz des Vertrauensschutzes – Antrag auf Wiedereröffnung des mündlichen Verfahrens im ersten Rechtszug – Art. 113 Abs. 2 Buchst. c der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichts.#Rechtssache C-288/21 P. This document does not exist in English.
november 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0289: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 November 2022.#IG v Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union Effective judicial protection – National procedural rule providing that an action seeking to dispute the compatibility of a national provision with EU law is devoid of purpose where the provision is repealed in the course of proceedings.#Case C-289/21.
maj 25, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0290: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 May 2023.#Staatlich genehmigte Gesellschaft der Autoren, Komponisten und Musikverleger Reg. Gen. mbH (AKM) v Canal+ Luxembourg Sàrl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission – Directive 93/83/EEC – Article 1(2) – Communication to the public by satellite – Concept – Satellite package provider – Broadcasting of programmes in another Member State – Place of the act of exploitation by which that provider participates in such communication.#Case C-290/21.
avgust 01, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0290_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 May 2023.#Staatlich genehmigte Gesellschaft der Autoren, Komponisten und Musikverleger Reg. Gen. mbH (AKM) v Canal+ Luxembourg Sàrl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and rights related to copyright applicable to satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission – Directive 93/83/EEC – Article 1(2) – Communication to the public by satellite – Concept – Satellite package provider – Broadcasting of programmes in another Member State – Place of the act of exploitation by which that provider participates in such communication.#Case C-290/21.
april 21, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0291: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 April 2023.#Proceedings brought by Starkinvest SRL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 – European Account Preservation Order procedure – Conditions for issuing a preservation order – Article 4 – Concept of ‘judgment’ – Article 7 – Concept of ‘judgment requiring the debtor to pay the creditor’s claim’ – Judgment ordering a party to make a penalty payment for breach of a prohibitory order – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 55 – Scope.#Case C-291/21.
januar 19, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0292: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 January 2023.#Administración General del Estado and Others v Asociación para la Defensa de los Intereses Comunes de las Autoescuelas (AUDICA) and Ministerio Fiscal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2006/123/EC – Services in the internal market – Article 2(2)(d) – Substantive scope – Service in the field of transport – Provision of road safety awareness and re-education courses for the recovery of driving licence points – Concession to operate a public service – Article 15 – Requirements – Division of the relevant territory into five lots – Quantitative and territorial limit on access to the activity concerned – Overriding reasons in the public interest – Justification – Road safety – Proportionality – Service of g
februar 26, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0292_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 January 2023.#Administración General del Estado and Others v Asociación para la Defensa de los Intereses Comunes de las Autoescuelas (AUDICA) and Ministerio Fiscal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2006/123/EC – Services in the internal market – Article 2(2)(d) – Substantive scope – Service in the field of transport – Provision of road safety awareness and re-education courses for the recovery of driving licence points – Concession to operate a public service – Article 15 – Requirements – Division of the relevant territory into five lots – Quantitative and territorial limit on access to the activity concerned – Overriding reasons in the public interes
oktober 06, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0293: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 October 2022.#UAB ,,Vittamed technologijos“, en liquidation v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Deductions of input VAT – Goods and services used by the taxable person to produce capital goods – Articles 184 to 187 – Adjustment of deductions – Obligation to adjust deductions of VAT in the event of that taxable person being placed in liquidation and removed from the register of VAT payers.#Case C-293/21.
avgust 01, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0294: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg and Administration de l'enregistrement et des domaines v Navitours SARL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC – Article 2(1) – Scope – Taxable transactions – Article 9(2)(b) – Place where transport services are supplied – Tourist trips on the Moselle – River subject to condominium status.#Case C-294/21.
oktober 20, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021CJ0295: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#Allianz Benelux SA v État belge, SPF Finances.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Directive 90/435/EEC – Article 4(1) – Exemption in favour of a parent company of the dividends paid by its subsidiary – Carrying over definitively taxed income surpluses to subsequent tax years – Absorption of a company with definitively taxed income surpluses by another company – National legislation limiting the transfer of those surpluses to the absorbing company.#Case C-295/21.