maj 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0589_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 March 2026.#Ministero dell'Interno and Questura Ragusa v TV en tant que représentant légal de 23 PLAY srls.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Giustizia amministrativa per la Regione siciliana.#Case C-589/25.
november 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0590: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 30 October 2025.#Alireza Malekzadeh Arasteh v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Actions for damages – Request for the initiation of infringement proceedings against the Kingdom of Sweden – Decision of the European Commission rejecting that request – Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-590/25 P(R).
april 08, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0590_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 30 October 2025.#Alireza Malekzadeh Arasteh v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Actions for damages – Request for the initiation of infringement proceedings against the Kingdom of Sweden – Decision of the European Commission rejecting that request – Damage allegedly suffered by the appellant – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-590/25 P(R).
april 01, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0593: Ordonnance de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 25 mars 2026.#T. sp. z o.o. contre Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Directive 2003/96/CE – Taxation des produits énergétiques et de l’électricité – Article 21, paragraphe 5 – Droits d’accise perçus par un État membre en violation du droit de l’Union – Droit du producteur d’électricité au remboursement du trop-perçu – Pratique jurisprudentielle subordonnant le droit au remboursement à la démonstration d’un préjudice patrimonial – Enrichissement sans cause – Principe d’effectivité du droit de l’Union.#Affaire C-593/25. This document does not exist in English.
april 08, 2026 0 8 CELEX:62025CO0593_INF: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#T. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Case C-593/25.
januar 26, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0597: Order of the Court of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-597/25 P.
maj 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0597_INF: Order of the Court of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-597/25 P.
januar 26, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0598: Order of the Court of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-598/25 P.
maj 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0598_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v Ferrari SpA and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-598/25 P.
julij 08, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0609: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 29 juin 2026.#„Е.М.“ ** contre A.М.А.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 100, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Litige au principal devenu sans objet – Non-lieu à statuer.#Affaire C-609/25. This document does not exist in English.