september 10, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0457_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 September 2026.#Hungary v Council of the European Union and Facilité européenne pour la paix.#Common foreign and security policy – European Peace Facility (EPF) – Decision of the EPF Committee on the allocation to the Ukrainian Armed Forces of the first instalment of the extraordinary revenues from frozen Russian assets – Lack of jurisdiction on the part of the EU judicature.#Case T-457/24.
september 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0459: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Roman Trotsenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/
september 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0460: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 September 2026.#Polina Sergeevna Gagarina v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support of actions which undermine the territorial integrity of Ukraine’ – Article 2(1)(a) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 –
november 08, 2025 0 18 CELEX:62024TJ0461_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#SHS - Stahl-Holding-Saar GmbH & Co. KGaA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-461/24.
november 08, 2025 0 18 CELEX:62024TJ0462_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#SHS - Stahl-Holding-Saar GmbH & Co. KGaA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-462/24.
september 24, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0463: Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 23 septembre 2026.#Stéphanie Christiane Demblon contre Parlement européen.#Droit institutionnel – Réglementation concernant la sécurité et la protection au Parlement – Règles d’accès au Parlement – Interdiction d’accès – Décision initiale du Parlement portant interdiction d’accès aux bâtiments du Parlement – Remplacement de la décision initiale par une décision ultérieure – Demande de non-lieu à statuer – Rejet – Article 7 des règles d’accès au Parlement – Intérêt du Parlement – Situations spécifiques – Liberté d’expression – Liberté de réunion – Droit d’être entendu – Proportionnalité – Responsabilité.#Affaire T-463/24. This document does not exist in English.
oktober 22, 2026 0 2 CELEX:62024TJ0463_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 23 September 2026.#Stéphanie Christiane Demblon v European Parliament.#Cases T-463/24 and T-665/24.
november 15, 2025 0 23 CELEX:62024TJ0464: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 November 2025.#V-Label GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-464/24.
januar 26, 2026 0 18 CELEX:62024TJ0464_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 November 2025.#V-Label GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-464/24.
februar 25, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0465: Arrêt du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 25 février 2026.#FA contre Banque européenne d'investissement.#Fonction publique – Personnel de la BEI – Dispense de service – Procédure d’enquête – Réaffectation – Responsabilité – Acte faisant grief – Prescription de l’action – Délai raisonnable – Autonomie des voies de recours – Recevabilité – Devoir de sollicitude – Principe de bonne administration.#Affaire T-465/24. This document does not exist in English.