november 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0415_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Cham Wings Airlines LLC v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘association with the Syrian regime’ – Error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality.#Case T-415/24.
september 03, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0416: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2026.#ES v European Commission.#Civil service – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/AD/03/22 (AD 5) – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the competition – Principle of good administration – Duty of diligence and duty of care – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-416/24.
julij 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0417: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2025.#ET v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Individual award – OLAF investigation – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Article 16.3 of the EIB Staff Rules – Principle of good administration – Principle of transparency – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.#Case T-417/24.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0417_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2025.#ET v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Individual award – OLAF investigation – Recovery of sums unduly paid – Article 16.3 of the EIB Staff Rules – Principle of good administration – Principle of transparency – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.#Case T-417/24.
maj 14, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0418: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Biogena GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark BIOGENA MOMENTS – Earlier national word mark MOMENT – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-418/24.
oktober 29, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0418_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 May 2025.#Biogena GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark BIOGENA MOMENTS – Earlier national word mark MOMENT – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-418/24.
september 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0425: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025 (Extracts).#Ffauf Italia SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark pastaZARA Sublime – Earlier EU word mark ZARA – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No link between the signs – No risk of unfair advantage being taken of the mark with a reputation – Existence of due cause for the use of the mark applied for.#Case T-425/24.
september 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0425_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025 (Extracts).#Ffauf Italia SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark pastaZARA Sublime – Earlier EU word mark ZARA – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No link between the signs – No risk of unfair advantage being taken of the mark with a reputation – Existence of due cause for the use of the mark applied for.#Case T-425/24.
junij 18, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0428: Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 17 juin 2026.#République portugaise contre Commission européenne.#FEAGA et Feader – Dépenses exclues du financement – Dépenses effectuées par le Portugal – Période de rétention – Remplacement d’animaux – Modalités de calcul de l’augmentation du taux de contrôle sur place – Éléments de preuve du doute sérieux et raisonnable.#Affaire T-428/24. This document does not exist in English.