februar 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0041(02)_INF: Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 7 juin 2024.#LGAI Technological Center, SA et jtsec Beyond IT Security, SL contre Agence de l’Union européenne pour le programme spatial.#Référé – Marchés publics de services – Services d’accréditation de sécurité – Demande de mesures provisoires – Défaut de fumus boni juris.#Affaire T-41/24 R. This document does not exist in English.
december 18, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0043_INF: Ordonnance du président du Tribunal du 4 mars 2024.#Penta system Srl contre Commission européenne.#Référé – Marchés publics de services – Procédure d’appel d’offres – Rejet de l’offre d’un soumissionnaire et attribution du marché à un autre soumissionnaire – Demande de sursis à exécution – Méconnaissance des exigences de forme – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-43/24 R. This document does not exist in English.
marec 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0045: Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 February 2025.#ePURE, de Europese Producenten Unie van Hernieuwbare Ethanol and Pannonia Bio Zrt. v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Energy – Regulation (EU) 2023/2405 – Obligation placed on aviation fuel suppliers to ensure that all aviation fuel made available to aircraft operators at each EU airport contains the minimum shares of sustainable aviation fuels – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-45/24.
marec 22, 2024 0 20 CELEX:62024TO0063(01): Order of the President of the General Court of 19 March 2024.#Asociación Europa Iustitia and Umanità e Ragione v Council of the European Union.#Case T-63/24 R.
februar 08, 2025 0 20 CELEX:62024TO0063(01)_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 19 March 2024.#Asociación Europa Iustitia and Umanità e Ragione v Council of the European Union.#Case T-63/24 R.
november 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0069: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 November 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark puma acoustics – Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-69/24.
julij 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0069_INF: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 November 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark puma acoustics – Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-69/24.
april 14, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0080: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2025.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark GO HANDS FREE – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-80/24.
november 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0080_INF: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2025.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark GO HANDS FREE – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-80/24.
april 14, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TO0081: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 7 April 2025.#Skechers USA, Inc. II v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark STEP IN AND GO – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of good administration – Articles 20 and 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-81/24.