marec 10, 2026 0 4 CELEX:62025CO0293_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#RT v Sofiyska apelativna prokuratura.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad - Sofia.#Case C-293/25.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0303: Order of the Court of 11 November 2025.#May OOO v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-303/25 P.
januar 14, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0303_INF: Order of the Court of 11 November 2025.#May OOO v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-303/25 P.
december 16, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0304: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 8 décembre 2025.#Lidl Bulgaria EOOD et KO KD contre Nachalnik na otdel „Operativni deynosti“ v GD „Fiskalen kontrol“ v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence de présentation du contexte factuel et réglementaire du litige au principal – Exigence d’indication du lien entre les dispositions du droit de l’Union dont l’interprétation est demandée et la législation nationale applicable – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-304/25. This document does not exist in English.
november 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0305: Order of the Court of 28 October 2025.#eBilet Polska sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-305/25 P.
december 11, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0305_INF: Order of the Court of 28 October 2025.#eBilet Polska sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-305/25 P.
oktober 13, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0306: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 2 octobre 2025.#Robin Messiaen et Ferenc Ballegeer contre Conseil de l'Union européenne et Parlement européen.#Pourvoi – Article 181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Rapprochement des législations – Règlement (UE) 2024/1624 – Prévention de l’utilisation du système financier aux fins du blanchiment de capitaux ou du financement du terrorisme – Recours en annulation – Recevabilité – Article 263, quatrième alinéa, TFUE – Condition selon laquelle le requérant doit être individuellement concerné – Pourvoi manifestement non fondé.#Affaire C-306/25 P. This document does not exist in English.
januar 06, 2026 0 6 CELEX:62025CO0306_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 October 2025.#Robin Messiaen and Ferenc Ballegeer v Council of the European Union and European Parliament.#Case C-306/25 P.
marec 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CO0316: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 3 février 2026.#Regione Umbria contre Ge.Fi.L. – Gestione Fiscalità Locale SpA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Réponse pouvant être clairement déduite de la jurisprudence – Marchés publics – Directive 2014/24/UE – Article 12, paragraphe 4 – Attribution d’un marché à un établissement public non économique sans mise en concurrence – Exception relative aux contrats relevant de la coopération entre entités publiques – Contrat confiant à un établissement public à but non économique la gestion des registres en matière de taxe sur les véhicules automobiles.#Affaire C-316/25. This document does not exist in English.
marec 12, 2026 0 6 CELEX:62025CO0316_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 February 2026.#Regione Umbria v Ge.Fi.L. - Gestione Fiscalità Locale SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Case C-316/25.