september 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0083: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered European Union design representing decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-83/24.
september 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0083_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered European Union design representing decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-83/24.
april 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0084: Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 22 avril 2026.#UU contre Cour de justice de l'Union européenne.#Traitement des données à caractère personnel – Protection des personnes physiques à l’égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel par les institutions, organes et organismes de l’Union – Règlement (UE) 2018/1725 – Documents relatifs à des procédures d’assistance et d’alerte – Refus d’accès – Demande de réexamen – Recours en annulation – Absence de faits nouveaux et substantiels – Irrecevabilité – Responsabilité non contractuelle – Violation suffisamment caractérisée d’une règle de droit conférant des droits aux particuliers.#Affaire T-84/24. This document does not exist in English.
september 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0086: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Vinatis v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VINATIS – Earlier Benelux word mark VINITES – Relative ground for refusal – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Admissibility of new evidence – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Cross-claim before the General Court.#Case T-86/24.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0086_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Vinatis v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VINATIS – Earlier Benelux word mark VINITES – Relative ground for refusal – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Admissibility of new evidence – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Cross-claim before the General Court.#Case T-86/24.
julij 31, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0089_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński sp.j. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Matjesfilethappen nach ‘Kolberger Art’ – Absolute grounds for invalidity – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-89/24.
julij 31, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0090_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Kapitan Navi Elżbieta Stramek i Waldemar Karpiński sp.j. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Matjeshappen nach ‘Kolberger Art’ – Absolute grounds for invalidity – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-90/24.
september 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0091: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered European Union design representing decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-91/24.
september 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0091_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered European Union design representing decoration for bags of packaging – Earlier national word and figurative marks – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Applicable substantive law – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-91/24.
september 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0092: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 September 2025.#Eti Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered European Union design representing packaging – Earlier national figurative mark – Ground for invalidity – Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Rights of the defence – Scope of the examination carried out by the Board of Appeal.#Case T-92/24.