Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CO0766: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Criminal proceedings against AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law or admits of no reasonable doubt – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Scope – Judgment ordering the committal of a person to a facility for offenders with mental illness – Suspension subject to that person undergoing medical treatment.#Case C-766/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CO0774:           Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 14 mars 2025.#Eurosemillas SA contre Office communautaire des variétés végétales (OCVV).#Pourvoi – Protection des obtentions végétales – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non‑admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-774/24 P.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CO0800: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#Tertianum Services AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by a person who was not a party to the proceedings before the General Court – EU trade mark – Articles 174 to 176 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Replacement of a party – Transfer of an intellectual property right during the proceedings before the General Court – No application for replacement.#Case C-800/24 P.

0 0

CELEX:62024CO0800_INF: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#Tertianum Services AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by a person who was not a party to the proceedings before the General Court – EU trade mark – Articles 174 to 176 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Replacement of a party – Transfer of an intellectual property right during the proceedings before the General Court – No application for replacement.#Case C-800/24 P.

0 0

CELEX:62024CO0804(02): Order of the Court of 12 June 2025.#Polynt SpA v European Chemicals Agency.#Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) – European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-804/24 P.

0 0

CELEX:62024CO0804(02)_INF: Order of the Court of 12 June 2025.#Polynt SpA v European Chemicals Agency.#Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) – European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-804/24 P.

RSS
First27322733273427352737273927402741Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top