september 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0425: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025 (Extracts).#Ffauf Italia SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark pastaZARA Sublime – Earlier EU word mark ZARA – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No link between the signs – No risk of unfair advantage being taken of the mark with a reputation – Existence of due cause for the use of the mark applied for.#Case T-425/24.
september 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0425_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025 (Extracts).#Ffauf Italia SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark pastaZARA Sublime – Earlier EU word mark ZARA – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No link between the signs – No risk of unfair advantage being taken of the mark with a reputation – Existence of due cause for the use of the mark applied for.#Case T-425/24.
april 02, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0429: Arrêt du Tribunal (troisième chambre) du 2 avril 2025.#Paul Hartmann AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Enregistrement international désignant l’Union européenne – Marque verbale MEDISET – Cause de nullité absolue – Absence de caractère distinctif – Caractère descriptif – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b) et c), du règlement (CE) no 40/94 [devenu article 7, paragraphe 1, sous b) et c), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001].#Affaire T-429/24. This document does not exist in English.
september 26, 2025 0 7 CELEX:62024TJ0429_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 April 2025.#Paul Hartmann AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-429/24.
junij 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0431: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2025.#Certinvest SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Premium Quality REGAL Bakery – Earlier EU word mark REGAL and earlier EU figurative mark Regal – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-431/24.
november 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0431_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 June 2025.#Certinvest SRL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Premium Quality REGAL Bakery – Earlier EU word mark REGAL and earlier EU figurative mark Regal – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-431/24.
julij 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0432: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 July 2025.#Glaxo Group Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of an inhaler – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 51(2) of Regulation No 40/94 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Res judicata – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-432/24.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0432_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 23 July 2025.#Glaxo Group Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of an inhaler – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 51(2) of Regulation No 40/94 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Res judicata – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-432/24.
februar 25, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0433: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 February 2026.#Edward William Batchelor v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 – Documents relating to designation as a gatekeeper – Refusal of access – Obligation to state reasons – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Overriding public interest – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-433/24.