Related articles

• CELEX:62024TO0670: Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 7 July 2026.#Recrytera Srl v European Commission.#Actions for annulment – Public procurement – Tendering procedure – Provision of computer-based testing services and related services for the selection of EU staff – Contract notice – Implicit decision not to acquire on-site computer-based testing services – Decision to award the contract – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Cases T-670/24 and T-607/25.
• CELEX:62026CO0446: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 July 2026.#RI v Openbaar Ministerie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of conducting a criminal prosecution or executing custodial sentences – Article 6(1) – Issuing judicial authority – Article 8(1)(c) – European arrest warrant issued by the public prosecutor’s office on the basis of a national arrest warrant issued by a court – No judicial review concerning the issue of the European arrest warrant – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Uni
• CELEX:62021TO0219:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (cinquième chambre) du 8 juillet 2026.#Agora Invest, SA contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Procédure – Taxation des dépens – Absence de contestation – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire T-219/21 DEP.
• CELEX:62024CJ0242_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Appeal – State aid – Combined heat and power generation sector – Reform of the arrangements for support for cogeneration – Decision of the European Commission declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Measures granted through State resources – Condition relating to the existence of a compulsory surcharge.#Case C-242/24 P.
• CELEX:62025CC0279: Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 9 July 2026.###
• CELEX:62024CJ0771: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Fédération belge du stationnement ASBL and Interparking SA v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, représentée par son Gouvernement.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2001/42/EC – Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment – Article 2(a) – Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ – Article 3(2)(a) – Measures prepared for certain sectors and setting a framework for future development consent of projects listed in Annexes I and II to Directive 2011/92/EU – Plan or programme in the transport, town and country planning or land use sector – Order laying down the conditions for operating car parks – Maintenance of the effects of a national act where there is no environmental im
• CELEX:62025CJ0307: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#KFZ Kolak e.U. v GF.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive (EU) 2019/771 – Contracts for the sale of goods – Article 13(4)(c) – Remedies for lack of conformity of the goods – Concept of a ‘lack of conformity which is of such a serious nature as to justify an immediate price reduction or termination of the sales contract’ – Lack of conformity relating to the safety of the goods – Bringing the goods into conformity inexpensively.#Case C-307/25.
• CELEX:62025CC0170: Opinion of Advocate General Spielmann delivered on 9 July 2026.###
• CELEX:62025CC0535: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 9 July 2026.###
• CELEX:62024CJ0242: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Appeal – State aid – Combined heat and power generation sector – Reform of the arrangements for support for cogeneration – Decision of the European Commission declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Measures granted through State resources – Condition relating to the existence of a compulsory surcharge.#Case C-242/24 P.
• CELEX:62025CJ0234: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Sky Österreich Fernsehen GmbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Consumer rights – Directive 2011/83/EC – Exceptions from the right of withdrawal – Contracts for the supply of digital content which is not supplied on a tangible medium – Article 16(m) – Subscription to a streaming service – Supply of digital services – Offer of a dynamic nature going beyond the mere stable and, as the case may be, continuous provision of specific content.#Case C-234/25.
• CELEX:62024CJ0888: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Adão da Fonseca-Engenheiros Consultores, Lda v Metro do Porto, S.A. and Betar Consultores, Lda.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 82 – Procedure relating to a design contest – No prior hearing of candidates – Protection of anonymity – Right to be heard.#Case C-888/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0856: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Sad Trasporto Locale SpA v Provincia autonoma di Bolzano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Public passenger transport services by rail and by road – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Article 5(1) and (2) – Direct award of a public passenger transport services contract to an internal operator – Conditions – Applicable rules – Directive 2014/23/EU – Award of concession contracts – Point 1 of Article 5 – Concept of ‘services concession’ – Transfer of an operating risk – Directive 2014/24/EU – Public procurement – Article 12 – Concept of ‘control similar to that which a contracting authority exercises over its own departments’ – National legislation limiting the direct award of public service contracts to an
• CELEX:62024CJ0788: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Anne Frank Fonds v Anne Frank Stichting and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3(1) – Concept of ‘communication to the public’ – Article 6(3) – Effective technological measures – Work that is in the public domain in certain Member States and still protected by copyright in another Member State – Publication of that work on a website – Geo-blocking measure designed to prevent access to that website from the Member State in which the work is still protected – Possibility of circumventing that measure by means of a virtual private network (VPN) or similar service.#Case C-788/24.
• CELEX:62025CJ0186: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Institut po ribni resursi Varna v Rakovoditel na Natsionalnia organ po Savmestna operativna programa za transgranichno satrudnichestvo „Chernomorski baseyn 2014-2020“ i direktor na direktsia „Upravlenie na teritorialnoto satrudnichestvo“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Own resources of the European Union – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) – Regulation (EU) No 232/2014 – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 897/2014 – Cross-border Cooperation Programme for the Black Sea Region – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Direct award – Conce
• CELEX:62024CJ0768: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Hortis GRC SA v JA and France Travail Île-de-France, anciennement Pôle emploi Île-de-France.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations – Article 3 – Choice made by the parties – Article 6 – Contract of employment – Mandatory rules of the law which would be applicable in the absence of choice – Determination of the applicable law – Contract of employment more closely connected with another country – Criteria for assessment – Closer connections resulting, in the performance of a contract of employment, from the parties’ choice of the law applicable to that contract.#Case C-768/24.
• CELEX:62025CJ0188: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Štátny fond rozvoja bývania v GL and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘seller or supplier’ – Loan and guarantee agreements – State Housing Development Fund – Task carried out in the public interest – Loans granted on preferential terms – Referral back for reconsideration following an appeal – Obligation to comply with the legal rulings of a higher court – Principle of the primacy of EU law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case C-188/25.
• CELEX:62023CJ0428_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#ROGON GmbH & Co. KG and Others v Deutscher Fußballbund eV (DFB).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Competition – Professional football – Article 101(1) TFEU – Prohibition of agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Regulations of a national football federation – Purchase of services from third parties outside that federation – Activity of the players’ agents – Restriction of competition by object or by effect – Exception to the prohibition in Article 101(1) TFEU – Scope – Objectives pursued by those regulations – Whether justified – Conditions – Pursuit of legitimate objectives in the public interest – Necessity – Proportionality.#Case C-428/23.
• CELEX:62024CJ0199: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#ND v Legal Newsdesk Sweden AB, anciennement Garrapatica AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Scope – Making information relating to criminal convictions available to the public online in return for remuneration – Reconciling the right to protection of personal data with the right to freedom of expression and information – Article 79 – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Scope – Article 85 – Concept of processing of personal data carried out for ‘journalistic purposes’.#Case C-199/24.
• CELEX:62025CJ0166:           Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 9 juillet 2026.#Commission européenne contre République portugaise.#Recours en manquement – Directive 2010/75/UE – Émissions industrielles (prévention et réduction intégrées de la pollution) – Transposition incorrecte ou incomplète.#Affaire C-166/25.