september 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0798_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 September 2026.#A et autres v Latvijas Republikas Saeima.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5 – Principles relating to processing of personal data – Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing – Company law – Directive (EU) 2017/1132 – Article 14 – Documents and particulars to be disclosed – Concept of ‘persons who take part in the administration, supervision or control of a company’ – Making available to the public personal data relating to the shareholders of public limited liability companies – Minority shareholders.#Case C-798/24.
junij 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0801: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 June 2026.#NKO AO National Settlement Depository (NSD) v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1)(f) – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 3(1)(f) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Concept of ‘supporting, materially or financially, … the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Obligation to state reasons – Interpretation – Right to property – Limitations – Principle of proportionality – Account to be taken of the situation and economic interests of the appellant’s customers.#Case C-801/24 P.
junij 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0801_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 June 2026.#NKO AO National Settlement Depository (NSD) v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1)(f) – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 3(1)(f) – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Concept of ‘supporting, materially or financially, … the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Obligation to state reasons – Interpretation – Right to property – Limitations – Principle of proportionality – Account to be taken of the situation and economic interests of the appellant’s customers.#Case C-801/24 P.
oktober 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0805: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko and Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2 – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Article 9(2) – Obligation requiring persons subject to a fund-freezing measure to report funds and economic resources – Legal classification of such an obligation – Legal basis – Article 215(2) TFEU – Articles 24, 26 and 29 TEU – Implementation of the common foreign and security policy by the Member States.#Case C-805/24 P.
oktober 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0805_RES: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko and Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 2 – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Article 9(2) – Obligation requiring persons subject to a fund-freezing measure to report funds and economic resources – Legal classification of such an obligation – Legal basis – Article 215(2) TFEU – Articles 24, 26 and 29 TEU – Implementation of the common foreign and security policy by the Member States.#Case C-805/24 P.
oktober 09, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0808: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#M. R. v Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Point 1 of Article 2 – Definition of ‘working time’ – Article 6(b) – Maximum weekly working time – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Working time of firefighters – On-call time at the workplace not included in working time – Right to compensation for non-material damage from a Member State for infringement of EU law – Conditions – Method of calculating compensation for damage incurred on account of the infringement of Article 6(b) of Directive 2003/88 – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-808/24.
oktober 09, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0808_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 October 2026.#M. R. v Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Point 1 of Article 2 – Definition of ‘working time’ – Article 6(b) – Maximum weekly working time – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Working time of firefighters – On-call time at the workplace not included in working time – Right to compensation for non-material damage from a Member State for infringement of EU law – Conditions – Method of calculating compensation for damage incurred on account of the infringement of Article 6(b) of Directive 2003/88 – Principle of equivalence – Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-808/24.
september 11, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0809: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2026.#Trenitalia SpA v Regione Liguria.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Public passenger transport services by rail – Article 4(1)(b) – Mandatory content of public service contracts – Public service compensation – Calculation method – Article 6(1) – Obligation to comply with the provisions set out in the annex to that regulation in case of direct award of the public service contract – Points 2, 5 and 6 of that annex – Concept of ‘reasonable profit’ – Waiver by the regional public rail transport service operator of a reasonable profit during a transitional period – Coverage of all the costs incurred by that operator.#Case C-809/24.
oktober 14, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0809_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2026.#Trenitalia SpA v Regione Liguria.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Public passenger transport services by rail – Article 4(1)(b) – Mandatory content of public service contracts – Public service compensation – Calculation method – Article 6(1) – Obligation to comply with the provisions set out in the annex to that regulation in case of direct award of the public service contract – Points 2, 5 and 6 of that annex – Concept of ‘reasonable profit’ – Waiver by the regional public rail transport service operator of a reasonable profit during a transitional period – Coverage of all the costs incurred by that
februar 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0810: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#Urban Vision SpA v Comune di Milano and Digital Vox Srl, anciennement A&C Network Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/23/EU – Procedure for the award of concession contracts – Project financing at the initiative of a private operator – Assessment and approval of a financing proposal – Call for tenders launched on the basis of that proposal – Pre-emption right of the economic operator that is the promoter, subject to ensuring the conditions of the best offer – Modification made after the submission of the initial offer – Article 3 – Principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination and transparency – Breach.#Case C-810/24.