julij 09, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0347: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Target Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing three red and white concentric circles – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-347/24.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0347_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2025.#Target Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark representing three red and white concentric circles – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-347/24.
marec 26, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0348: Urteil des Gerichts (Dritte Kammer) vom 26. März 2025.#Cannafair GmbH gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Unionsmarke – Anmeldung der Unionswortmarke Cannafair – Absolutes Eintragungshindernis – Beschreibender Charakter – Art. 7 Abs. 1 Buchst. c der Verordnung (EU) 2017/1001.#Rechtssache T-348/24. This document does not exist in English.
september 26, 2025 0 8 CELEX:62024TJ0348_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2025.#Cannafair GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-348/24.
oktober 30, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0351: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Devin EAD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark DEVIN – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Right to be heard following an annulment judgment of the General Court – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-351/24.
oktober 30, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0351_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 October 2025.#Devin EAD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark DEVIN – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Right to be heard following an annulment judgment of the General Court – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) and Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-351/24.
november 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0352_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 June 2025.#CeramicSpeed Sport A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark OSPW System – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-352/24.
september 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0354: Arrêt du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 24 septembre 2025.#Mowi Poland S.A. contre Commission européenne.#Santé publique – Règles spécifiques d’hygiène des denrées alimentaires d’origine animale – Règlement (CE) no 853/2004 – Point 3, sous e), de l’annexe du règlement délégué (UE) 2024/1141 – Recours en annulation – Qualité pour agir – Intérêt à agir – Recevabilité – Notion de “produit congelé” – Absence de consultation de l’EFSA – Article 13 du règlement no 853/2004.#Affaire T-354/24. This document does not exist in English.
september 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0354_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Mowi Poland S.A. v European Commission.#Public health – Specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin – Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 – Point 3(e) of the Annex to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1141 – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility – Concept of ‘frozen product’ – Lack of consultation with EFSA – Article 13 of Regulation No 853/2004.#Case T-354/24.
januar 28, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0365: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#LU v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Psychological harassment – Administrative inquiry – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Decision to initiate disciplinary proceedings – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-365/24.