junij 20, 2026 0 7 CELEX:62024CJ0668_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Duygu Eliz Erkut v Fondazione Teatro alla Scala di Milano.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano.#Case C-668/24.
september 11, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0669: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2026.#Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Vodafone GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Telecommunications sector – Directive (EU) 2018/1972 – European Electronic Communications Code – Contract for electronic communications services – Power of the service provider to make changes unilaterally – First subparagraph of Article 105(4) – End users’ right to terminate the contract.#Case C-669/24.
september 24, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0669_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2026.#Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände - Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V. v Vodafone GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Telecommunications sector – Directive (EU) 2018/1972 – European Electronic Communications Code – Contract for electronic communications services – Power of the service provider to make changes unilaterally – First subparagraph of Article 105(4) – End users’ right to terminate the contract.#Case C-669/24.
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0679: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#HL v UniCredit Bank Zrt. and Momentum Credit Zrt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Loan agreement denominated in foreign currency – Term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Effects of a finding that the term is unfair – Action for restitution of the sums paid pursuant to the unfair term – Starting point of the limitation period for an action for restitution – Resumption of the limitation period after a period of suspension.#Case C-679/24.
marec 30, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0679_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#HL v UniCredit Bank Zrt. and Momentum Credit Zrt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Loan agreement denominated in foreign currency – Term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Effects of a finding that the term is unfair – Action for restitution of the sums paid pursuant to the unfair term – Starting point of the limitation period for an action for restitution – Resumption of the limitation period after a period of suspension.#Case C-679/24.
februar 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0680: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Kft. v Prezes Urzędu Lotnictwa Cywilnego.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Airport charges – Directive 2009/12/EC – Point 3 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘airport user’ – Article 6(2) – Obligation on the airport managing body to consult with airport users regarding changes to the system or the level of airport charges – Point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Mandatory procedure for determining or approving airport charges or their maximum level by the independent supervisory authority – Second subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Article 11(1) and (7) – Obligation on that authority to consult with airport users regarding modifications of the system or the
april 28, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0680_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Kft. v Prezes Urzędu Lotnictwa Cywilnego.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Airport charges – Directive 2009/12/EC – Point 3 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘airport user’ – Article 6(2) – Obligation on the airport managing body to consult with airport users regarding changes to the system or the level of airport charges – Point (a) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Mandatory procedure for determining or approving airport charges or their maximum level by the independent supervisory authority – Second subparagraph of Article 6(5) – Article 11(1) and (7) – Obligation on
oktober 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0681: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 22 octobre 2026.#Commission européenne contre République tchèque.#Manquement d’État – Article 258 TFUE – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive 2013/48/UE – Droit d’accès à un avocat dans le cadre des procédures pénales – Article 3, paragraphe 3 – Droit des suspects et des personnes poursuivies à la présence de leur avocat et à la participation effective de celui-ci à leur interrogatoire – Notions de “présence” et de “participation effective” – Article 3, paragraphe 6 – Dérogation temporaire au droit d’accès à un avocat – Législation nationale permettant l’interrogatoire des suspects sans leur avocat si celui-ci est injoignable dans un délai déterminé – Transpo This document does not exist in English.
oktober 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0681_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 22 octobre 2026.#Commission européenne contre République tchèque.#Manquement d’État – Article 258 TFUE – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive 2013/48/UE – Droit d’accès à un avocat dans le cadre des procédures pénales – Article 3, paragraphe 3 – Droit des suspects et des personnes poursuivies à la présence de leur avocat et à la participation effective de celui-ci à leur interrogatoire – Notions de “présence” et de “participation effective” – Article 3, paragraphe 6 – Dérogation temporaire au droit d’accès à un avocat – Législation nationale permettant l’interrogatoire des suspects et des personnes poursuivies sans leur avocat si celui-ci est injoignable. This document does not exist in English.
maj 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0684: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Erste Kammer) vom 21. Mai 2026.#Across Fiduciaria SpA u. a. gegen Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri u. a.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Verhinderung der Nutzung des Finanzsystems zum Zwecke der Geldwäsche und der Terrorismusfinanzierung – Richtlinie (EU) 2015/849 – Art. 31 – Begriff der Rechtsvereinbarungen, die ‚in ihrer Struktur oder ihren Funktionen Trusts ähneln‘ – Mit Treuhandgesellschaften italienischen Rechts geschlossene Treuhandverträge (mandato fiduciario) – Zugang von Personen mit einem berechtigten Interesse zu den Informationen über die wirtschaftlichen Eigentümer – Gültigkeit – Art. 7 und 8 der Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union – Achtung des Privat- und Familienlebens – Schutz personenbezogener Daten – G This document does not exist in English.