Related articles

• CELEX:62024CJ0315_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Nestlé Sverige AB v Miljönämnden i Helsingborgs kommun.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food safety – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Provision of food information to consumers – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/128 – Food for special medical purposes – Specific information requirements – Mandatory nutrition declaration – Article 5(2)(g) – Additional mandatory particulars – Article 6(2) – Prohibition of the repetition on the labelling of information contained in the mandatory nutrition declaration.#Case C-315/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0514_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#Magyar Telekom Nyrt. v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság Elnöke.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Telecommunications sector – Directive (EU) 2018/1972 – European Electronic Communications Code – First subparagraph of Article 105(4) – Right of end-users to terminate their contact without further costs due to modifications unilaterally proposed by a provider of electronic communication services – Exceptions – Modifications directly imposed by EU law or national law.#Case C-514/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0413_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#Vlaams Gewest v P&O North Sea Ferries Limited and P&O Ferries Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ondernemingsrechtbank Gent, afdeling Oostende.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 – Application of the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport between Member States and between Member States and third countries – Article 56 TFEU – Article 191 of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Freedom to provide services – Restrictions – National legislation providing for the pa
• CELEX:62024CJ0633_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#F.F. v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Equal treatment – Aggregation of periods – Article 58 – Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons – Invalidity benefits – Supplement in order to guarantee receipt of the statutory minimum invalidity benefit – Stricter conditions relating to the contribution period for workers who have exercised their right to freedom of movement.#Case C-633/24.
• CELEX:62025TO0407:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (sixième chambre) du 18 juin 2026.#Biofa GmbH contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation – Produits phytopharmaceutiques – Substance de base hydrogénocarbonate de sodium – Règlement d’exécution (UE) 2015/2069 – Modification du rapport d’examen concernant l’hydrogénocarbonate de sodium – Retrait partiel de l’approbation de l’hydrogénocarbonate de sodium en tant que substance de base – Défaut d’affectation directe – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-407/25.
• CELEX:62024CJ0131_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Umweltorganisation VIRUS – Verein Projektwerkstatt für Umwelt und Soziales and Others v Amt der Niederösterreichischen Landesregierung, Abteilung Landesstraßenplanung – ST3.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Conservation of wild birds – Directive 2009/147/EC – Prohibition on deliberately disturbing birds – Article 5(d) – Project for the construction of a road involving the possibility of disturbing certain specimens of certain species – Measures for preventing and mitigating disturbances – Proof of the effectiveness of those measures – Reasoned assessment of a court expert.#Case C-131/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0654_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#M.M. v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Ravenna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Allowance granted in the form of an electronic card to support the in-service training of teachers and enhance their professional skills – Grant reserved to teachers employed on a permanent basis – Discrimination against teachers employed on a fixed-term basis – National case-law precluding the retrospective grant of the benefit in question to the teachers concerned where they are no longer employed
• CELEX:62023CJ0649_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Institutul de Istorie şi Teorie Literară „G. Călinescu” and Fundaţia Naţională pentru Ştiinţă şi Artă v HK, en qualité d'héritier de TB and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2001/29/EC – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Reproduction right – Article 2(a) – Concept of a ‘work’ – Protection of works by copyright – Conditions – Directive 2006/116/EC – Article 5 – Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works – Article 2 – Critical edition of a pre-existing work the purpose of which is to restore a Latin manuscript
• CELEX:62024CJ0412_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS and Fauré Le Page Paris SAS v Goyard ST-Honoré SAS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 3(1)(g) – Grounds for refusal of registration or invalidity of a trade mark – Trade mark of such a nature as to deceive the public – Luxury leather goods – Trade mark which includes a number perceived by the relevant public as indicating the year of establishment of a business – Evocation, because that year is the distant past, of long-standing know-how bestowing on the product concerned a perceived guarantee of quality and a prestigious image – Misleading indication as to the characteristic
• CELEX:62024CJ0457_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Romania v European Commission.#Appeal – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2020 – Expenditure excluded from European Union financing – Expenditure incurred by Romania – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 52 – Conformity clearance procedure – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 908/2014 – Article 34 – Change in the legal basis of the European Commission’s proposals for financial corrections – Possibility for the Member State concerned to make its views on those proposals known in a meaningful way – Concept of ‘external factor’ – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 44 – Dive
• CELEX:62024CJ0757_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#SG v Gemeinde Wien.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeits- und Sozialgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – Regional legislation on the remuneration of contract staff members – Periods of employment completed before the age of 18 taken into account – New remuneration system replacing previous legislation found to be discriminatory.#Case C-757/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0527_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#Harry et Associés Sarl v Agenzia delle entrate – Riscossione – Pescara and Agenzia delle entrate – Centro operativo di Pescara.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di Giustizia Tributaria di primo grado di Pescara.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Refund of VAT – Directive 2008/9/EC – Articles 2, 15 and 23 – Principles of VAT neutrality, effectiveness and proportionality – Taxable person established in a Member State other than the Member State of VAT refund – Application for VAT refund – Technical fault in the electronic transmission of the application – Failure to act on the part of the tax authorities of the Member Sta
• CELEX:62024CJ0484: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#NTH Haustechnik GmbH v EM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(e) – Storage limitation – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing such data relating to a contract of employment in judicial proceedings – Article 17(3)(e) – No obligation to erase such data where processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims – Data collected by the employer with a view to proving a serious failure by the employee to comply with his or her obligations – Use of evidence obtained unlawfully.#Case C-484/24.
• CELEX:62025CC0550: Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 18 June 2026.###
• CELEX:62025TO0654_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2026.#Stanislav Dobrinov Stoyanov v Council of the European Union.#Case T-654/25 R.
• CELEX:62024TJ0545_INF: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 25 March 2026.#Implementing Technologies, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-545/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0575: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Vodovody a kanalizace Přerov, a.s. v Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Open data and the re-use of public sector information – Directive (EU) 2019/1024 – Article 2(3) – Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice – Concept of ‘public undertaking’ – Undertaking owned by several public sector bodies – Presumption of ‘dominant influence’ – Criteria for assessment.#Case C-575/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0658: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Penny Market Kft. v Komárom-Esztergom Vármegyei Kormányhivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products – Services in the internal market – National legislation imposing an obligation, for a specified period, on retailers of foodstuffs with a turnover in excess of a certain amount, to reduce the prices of certain foodstuffs and to have minimum quantities of those foodstuffs in stock – Measure taken as a result of a situation of emergency – Fines.#Case C-658/24.
• CELEX:62024CJ0880:           Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 18 juin 2026.#VK contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Agent temporaire – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Article 77 – Article 11, paragraphe 2, de l’annexe VIII – Article 5, paragraphe 1, sixième alinéa, des dispositions générales d’exécution des articles 11 et 12 de l’annexe VIII du statut relatifs au transfert de droits à pension – Pension d’ancienneté – Droits à pension acquis avant l’entrée au service de l’Union européenne – Délai dans lequel une demande de transfert vers le régime de pensions des institutions de l’Union doit être présentée – Rejet de la demande de transfert présentée hors délai – Circonstances exceptionnelles – Pandémie de COVID‑19.#Affaire C-880/24 P.
• CELEX:62025CC0395: Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 18 June 2026.###