julij 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0642_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Case C-642/24.
november 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0643: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Manuel Costa Filhos, Lda. v Oü Wine Port of Paldiski.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Rights of the defence – Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 – European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims – Article 20 – Enforcement procedure – Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State of enforcement – Articles 21 and 23 – Grounds for the refusal, stay or limitation of enforcement – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Article 8 – Refusal to accept the document – Failure to provide a translation into either a language which the addressee understands or the official language of the Member State of enforcement or, as the case may be, one
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0646: Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 19 mars 2026.#Commission européenne contre République de Bulgarie.#Manquement d’État – Article 258 TFUE – Directive (UE) 2019/882 – Exigences en matière d’accessibilité applicables aux produits et services – Absence de transposition et de communication des mesures de transposition – Article 260, paragraphe 3, TFUE – Sanctions pécuniaires – Demande de condamnation au paiement d’une somme forfaitaire et d’une astreinte – Désistement partiel.#Affaire C-646/24. This document does not exist in English.
januar 29, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0654: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#M.M. v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Allowance granted in the form of an electronic card to support the in-service training of teachers and enhance their professional skills – Grant reserved to teachers employed on a permanent basis – Discrimination against teachers employed on a fixed-term basis – National case-law precluding the retrospective grant of the benefit in question to the teachers concerned where they are no longer employed in the school system – Substitution, under certain conditions, of a right to
junij 20, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0654_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#M.M. v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Ravenna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Allowance granted in the form of an electronic card to support the in-service training of teachers and enhance their professional skills – Grant reserved to teachers employed on a permanent basis – Discrimination against teachers employed on a fixed-term basis – National case-law precluding the retrospective grant of the benefit in question to the teachers concerned where they are no longer employed
junij 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0658: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Penny Market Kft. v Komárom-Esztergom Vármegyei Kormányhivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products – Services in the internal market – National legislation imposing an obligation, for a specified period, on retailers of foodstuffs with a turnover in excess of a certain amount, to reduce the prices of certain foodstuffs and to have minimum quantities of those foodstuffs in stock – Measure taken as a result of a situation of emergency – Fines.#Case C-658/24.
oktober 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0659: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#A-GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt C.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Anti-dumping – Extended anti-dumping duty – Exemption of imports of certain bicycle parts originating in China – Exemption for the importation of small quantities by small-scale operators – Threshold of 300 units per type of essential bicycle parts declared for free circulation by a party or delivered to it.#Case C-659/24.
februar 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0659_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#A-GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt C.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Anti-dumping – Extended anti-dumping duty – Exemption of imports of certain bicycle parts originating in China – Exemption for the importation of small quantities by small-scale operators – Threshold of 300 units per type of essential bicycle parts declared for free circulation by a party or delivered to it.#Case C-659/24.
december 12, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0662: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 11 décembre 2025.#Commission européenne contre Royaume de Belgique.#Manquement d’État – Libre circulation des travailleurs – Article 45 TFUE – Article 28 de l’accord sur l’Espace économique européen – Arrêt de la Cour constatant un manquement – Article 260, paragraphe 2, TFUE – Exécution incomplète de l’arrêt du 10 mars 2022, Commission/Belgique (Déductions des rentes alimentaires) (C-60/21) – Impôt sur le revenu – Déduction des rentes alimentaires – Irrecevabilité – Absence d’identité entre les griefs soulevés et ceux formulés dans l’affaire ayant donné lieu à l’arrêt constatant le manquement.#Affaire C-662/24. This document does not exist in English.
december 12, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0665: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 December 2025.#Staatssecretaris Jeugd, Preventie en Sport v Diamond Flavours BV and UEG Holland BV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 2(40) – Concept of ‘placing on the market’ – Article 23(2) and (3) – Checks on the implementation of Directive 2014/40 – Objective of ensuring a high level of health protection – Approximation of laws – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Supply of refill containers for electronic cigarettes displaying an incorrect indication of the nicotine content on their packaging by a distributor of tobacco and related products to a retail outlet – Fine imposed on the distributor – Principle nulla poena sine culpa – Proportionality of the fine.#Case C-