april 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0752: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#mBank S.A. v KŁ and JŁ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Effects of a term being found to be unfair – Invalidity of the loan agreement – Actions for restitution – Limitation period for the action brought by the seller or supplier – Interruption of the limitation period – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of proportionality – Right of access to a court – Unjust enrichment.#Case C-752/24.
april 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0753: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski S.A. v MS et MS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 7(1) – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Effects of a term being found to be unfair – Invalidity of the loan agreement – Actions for restitution – Limitation period for the action brought by the seller or supplier – Circumstances that may justify disregarding the expiry of the limitation period – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of proportionality – Right of access to a court – Unjust enrichment.#Case C-753/24.
junij 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0754: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Neunte Kammer) vom 18. Juni 2026.#Fachverband Eisenhüttenschlacken eV gegen Europäische Kommission.#Rechtsmittel – Verordnung (EU) 2019/1009 – Art. 42 Abs. 7 und 8 – Bereitstellung von EU-Düngeprodukten auf dem Markt – Delegierte Verordnung (EU) 2022/973 – Art. 2 Abs. 2 und 3 – Kriterien für agronomische Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit bei der Verwendung von Nebenprodukten in EU-Düngeprodukten – Grenzwerte für Chrom und Vanadium in EU-Düngeprodukten, in denen Eisenschlacken als Nebenprodukte verwendet werden – Vorsorgeprinzip – Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit.#Rechtssache C-754/24 P. This document does not exist in English.
marec 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0757: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#SG v Gemeinde Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – Regional legislation on the remuneration of contract staff members – Periods of employment completed before the age of 18 taken into account – New remuneration system replacing previous legislation found to be discriminatory.#Case C-757/24.
junij 20, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0757_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#SG v Gemeinde Wien.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeits- und Sozialgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age – Regional legislation on the remuneration of contract staff members – Periods of employment completed before the age of 18 taken into account – New remuneration system replacing previous legislation found to be discriminatory.#Case C-757/24.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0758: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Große Kammer) vom 1. August 2025.#LC gegen Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione Internazionale di Roma – sezione procedure alla frontiera II.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Asylpolitik – Richtlinie 2013/32/EU – Gemeinsame Verfahren für die Zuerkennung und Aberkennung des internationalen Schutzes – Art. 36 und 37 – Begriff ‚sicherer Herkunftsstaat‘ – Bestimmung durch einen Gesetzgebungsakt – Anhang I – Kriterien – Art. 46 – Recht auf einen wirksamen Rechtsbehelf – Art. 47 der Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union – Gerichtliche Prüfung der nationalen Bestimmung eines Drittstaats als sicherer Herkunftsstaat – Offenlegung der Informationsquellen, auf die diese Entscheidung gestützt ist.#Rechtssache C-75 This document does not exist in English.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0758_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 1er août 2025.#LC contre Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione Internazionale di Roma – sezione procedure alla frontiera II.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique d’asile – Directive 2013/32/UE – Procédures communes pour l’octroi et le retrait de la protection internationale – Articles 36 et 37 – Notion de “pays d’origine sûr” – Désignation au moyen d’un acte législatif – Annexe I – Critères – Article 46 – Droit à un recours effectif – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Examen, par le juge, de la désignation par un État membre d’un pays tiers comme pays d’origine sûr – Publicité des sources d’information sur lesquelles cette décision est fondée.#Affaire C-758/24. This document does not exist in English.
junij 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0760: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 11 juin 2026.#Ammar Sharif contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises au regard de la situation en Syrie – Décision 2013/255/PESC – Règlement (UE) no 36/2012 – Gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Maintien du nom du requérant sur les listes des personnes, des entités et des organismes concernés – Critère de l’appartenance familiale.#Affaire C-760/24 P. This document does not exist in English.
april 24, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0761: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#HM and JD v AXA Bank Belgium SA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts concluded between a seller or supplier and a consumer – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘seller or supplier’ – Article 6(1) – Effects of the finding that such a term is unfair – Invalidity of the contract – Article 7(1) – Deterrent effect of the prohibition on unfair terms – Loan agreement denominated in foreign currency – Contractual term placing the exchange rate risk on the consumer – Transfer of a contract among sellers or suppliers under national law – Seller or supplier against whom the consumer may assert the legal consequences of the invalidity of an unfai
december 12, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0767: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 December 2025.#mBank S.A. v ML.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 7(1) – Effects of a term being found to be unfair – Contract declared void – Action brought by a seller or supplier seeking restitution of the amount of the loan paid under a contract which is to be annulled – Consequences of the submission of a declaration of set-off – Implied waiver of the objection that the action is time-barred – Effective exercise of the procedural rights of consumers – Principle of effectiveness – Dissuasive effect of the prohibition on unfair terms.#Case C-767/24.