maj 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0588_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Imballaggi Piemontesi Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Prohibition of restrictive practices – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law conducted by the national competition authorities – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – Time limit for closure of the investigation stage of the infringement proceedings – National legislation allowing the national competition authority unilaterally to postpone that time limit on account of circumstances which lead to an extension of the subject matter of those proceedings or of the number of u
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0589: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Almirall BV and Almirall SA v Infinity Pharma BV and Pharmaline BV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Scope – Article 2(1) – Medicinal products prepared industrially or manufactured by a method involving an industrial process – Article 3(2) – Medicinal products prepared in a pharmacy in accordance with the prescriptions of a pharmacopoeia and intended to be supplied directly to the patients served by the pharmacy in question – Exclusion from the directive’s scope – National regulation subjecting the latter medicinal products to an authorisation requirement on the basis of a numerical criterion.#Case C-589/24.
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0589_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 19 mars 2026.#Almirall BV et Almirall SA contre Infinity Pharma BV et Pharmaline BV.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Médicaments à usage humain – Directive 2001/83/CE – Champ d’application – Article 2, paragraphe 1 – Médicaments préparés industriellement ou fabriqués selon une méthode dans laquelle intervient un processus industriel – Article 3, point 2 – Médicaments préparés en pharmacie selon les indications d’une pharmacopée et destinés à être délivrés directement aux patients approvisionnés par cette pharmacie – Exclusion du champ d’application – Réglementation nationale soumettant ces derniers médicaments à une obligation d’autorisation en fonction d’un critère numérique.#Affaire C-589/24. This document does not exist in English.
januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0590: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.##Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement procedures – Directive 2014/23 – Award of concession contracts – Directive 2014/24 – Grounds for exclusion – National legislation establishing a register of public sector partners – Requirement of impartiality on the part of the person authorised to enter the public sector partner in that register – Imposition of a fine for non-compliance with that requirement – Automatic exclusion from participation in public procurement procedures in the event of non-payment of that fine – Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Criminal nature of the penalty – Predictability and proportionality of that penalty – Principle of legal certaint
marec 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0597: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#C.M. v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Directive 2000/78/EC – Prohibition of discrimination on the ground of disability – Article 2(2) – Right of a teacher with a disability to be transferred to a particular territorial area – Article 5 – Reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities – Priority for mobility within a territorial area as compared to mobility between different territorial areas.#Case C-597/24.
junij 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0601: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 June 2026.#Prokurator Prokuratury Rejonowej w Jarosławiu v V.B.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein – Japanese seahorse – Regulation (EC) No 338/97 – Article 2(t) – Concept of ‘specimen’ – Article 4(2) – Import permit – Article 2(j) and Article 7(3) – Personal or household effects – Article 16 – Criminal sanctions – Introduction into the European Union of specimens without an import permit – Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 – Article 57 – Introduction of personal or household effects into the European Union.#Case C-601/24.
julij 15, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0601_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 June 2026.#Prokurator Prokuratury Rejonowej w Jarosławiu v V.B.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein – Japanese seahorse – Regulation (EC) No 338/97 – Article 2(t) – Concept of ‘specimen’ – Article 4(2) – Import permit – Article 2(j) and Article 7(3) – Personal or household effects – Article 16 – Criminal sanctions – Introduction into the European Union of specimens without an import permit – Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 – Article 57 – Introduction of personal or household effects into the European Union.#Case C-601/24.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0602: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w W. v W. sp. z o.o.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions on exportation – Article 146(1)(b) – Supply of goods dispatched or transported to a destination outside the European Union – Transport of goods outside the European Union following an agreement between the person acquiring the goods and the supplier providing for their supply in another Member State – Goods which have actually left the territory of the European Union – Proof – Refusal of the exemption on exportation – Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality.#Case C-602/24.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0602_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#W. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w W.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Exemptions on exportation – Article 146(1)(b) – Supply of goods dispatched or transported to a destination outside the European Union – Transport of goods outside the European Union following an agreement between the person acquiring the goods and the supplier providing for their supply in another Member State – Goods which have actually left the territory of the European Union – Proof – Refusal of the exemption on exportation – Principles of fiscal neutralit
maj 14, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0603: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#Stellantis Portugal SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC – Point 1 of Article 2 – Liability to VAT – Supply of services effected for consideration – Criteria – Intra-group relationships – Adjustments of the transfer prices of motor vehicles between manufacturers and distributors – Account taken of the after-sales costs of repair of those vehicles incurred by the distributors – Existence of a direct link between the supply of services and the consideration actually received – Existence of a legal relationship pursuant to which there is reciprocal performance.#Case C-603/24.