Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0038: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#G.L. v AB SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – Articles 2, 5 and 7 – Articles 21, 24 and 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 1 – Article 2(1) and (2)(b) – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of disability – Indirect discrimination – Difference of treatment in respect of an employee who does not himself or herself have a disability but cares for his or her child who has a disability – Article 5 – Employer’s obligation to make reasonable accommodation.#Case C-38/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0038_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#G.L. v AB SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – Articles 2, 5 and 7 – Articles 21, 24 and 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 1 – Article 2(1) and (2)(b) – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of disability – Indirect discrimination – Difference of treatment in respect of an employee who does not himself or herself have a disability but cares for his or her child who has a disability – Article 5 – Employer’s obligation to make reasonable accommodation.#Case C-38/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0039_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#Justa v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia de Ceuta.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Articles 4 and 5 – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreements – Term concerning loan arrangement fees – Plainness and intelligibility of the terms.#Case C-39/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0041: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#Waltham Abbey Residents Association v An Bord Pleanála and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2011/92/EU – Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment – Article 2(1) and Article 4(2) – Projects covered by Annex II – Urban development projects – Article 4(4) and (5) – Obligations of the developer and the competent authority when the Member State concerned decides to require the determination provided for in those paragraphs 4 and 5 for those projects – Account taken of observations submitted by a third party, indicating a potential impact of the project concerned on an animal species covered by the strict protection provided for in Article 12 of

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0041_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#Waltham Abbey Residents Association v An Bord Pleanála and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2011/92/EU – Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment – Article 2(1) and Article 4(2) – Projects covered by Annex II – Urban development projects – Article 4(4) and (5) – Obligations of the developer and the competent authority when the Member State concerned decides to require the determination provided for in those paragraphs 4 and 5 for those projects – Account taken of observations submitted by a third party, indicating a potential impact of the project concerned on an animal sp

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0042: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 February 2025.#Emporiki Serron AE - Emporias kai Diathesis Agrotikon Proionton v Ypourgos Anaptyxis kai Ependyseon and Ypourgos Agrotikis Anaptyxis kai Trofimon.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Irregularities – Article 3 – Limitation period – Duration and starting point of that period – National legislation providing for a five-year limitation period as from the time the irregularity is discovered.#Case C-42/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0043: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#K. M. H. v Obshtina Stara Zagora.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Article 21(1) TFEU – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Impediments – Request to amend gender data in the civil status registers – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 4(3) – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private and family life – Obligation, for a court of a Member State, to comply with the case-law of the constitutional court of that State – Interpretation in conformity with EU law.#Case C-43/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0043_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 12 mars 2026.#K. M. H. contre Obshtina Stara Zagora.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Citoyenneté de l’Union – Article 21, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Droit de circuler et de séjourner librement sur le territoire des États membres – Obstacles – Demande de modification des données relatives au genre dans les registres d’état civil – Directive 2004/38/CE – Article 4, paragraphe 3 – Article 7 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Droit au respect de la vie privée et familiale – Obligation, pour une juridiction d’un État membre, de se conformer à la jurisprudence de la cour constitutionnelle de cet État – Interprétation conforme.#Affaire C-43/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0045: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 8(1) – Reimbursement of the price of a ticket in the event of cancellation of a flight – Commission collected by a person acting as an intermediary between the passenger and the air carrier when the ticket was bought – Conditions for inclusion – Amount of commission allegedly fixed without the air carrier’s knowledge – Burden of proof.#Case C-45/24.

RSS
First25702571257225732575257725782579Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top