junij 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0010: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 June 2026.#Dürr Dental SE v Cattani Deutschland Helmes GmbH & Co. KG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medical devices – Regulation (EU) 2017/745 – CE marking of a medical device falling under risk class IIa – Oil-free dry air compressors for the production of compressed air for dental treatment – Making available on the market – Obligations of distributors – Verification of the classification as a ‘medical device’ where the manufacturer has affixed a CE marking to the device in question as ‘machinery’.#Case C-10/24.
november 15, 2025 0 35 CELEX:62024CJ0013: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#AFG, SA (Zona Franca da Madeira) v European Commission.#Case C-13/24 P.
marec 10, 2026 0 28 CELEX:62024CJ0013_INF: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#AFG, SA (Zona Franca da Madeira) v European Commission.#Case C-13/24 P.
maj 15, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0015: Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 14 mai 2024.#CH contre Sofyiska rayonna prokuratura.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive 2013/48/UE – Droit d’accès à un avocat dans le cadre des procédures pénales – Article 3, paragraphe 6, sous b) – Dérogation temporaire au droit d’accès à un avocat dans des circonstances exceptionnelles – Article 9 – Renonciation à la présence ou à l’assistance d’un avocat – Conditions – Article 12, paragraphe 2 – Respect des droits de la défense et de l’équité de la procédure – Admissibilité des preuves – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Renonciation écrite d’un suspect analphabète à son droit d’accès à un avocat – Absence d’explication sur les conséquences This document does not exist in English.
februar 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0015_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 May 2024.#Criminal proceedings against CH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2013/48/EU – The right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings – Article 3(6)(b) – Temporary derogation from the right of access to a lawyer in exceptional circumstances – Article 9 – Waiver of the presence or assistance of a lawyer – Conditions – Article 12(2) – Respect for the rights of the defence and the fairness of the proceedings – Admissibility of evidence – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Written waiver of an illiterate suspect’s right of access to a lawyer – No explanation as
februar 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0016: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Sofiyska gradska prokuratura v YR and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection – National rules on how cases are allocated among the judges of a given court – Allocation of cases by the head of court management – Power of the judge assigned to verify the lawfulness of the allocation.#Case C-16/24.
oktober 23, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0016_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Criminal proceedings against YR and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Effective judicial protection – National rules on how cases are allocated among the judges of a given court – Allocation of cases by the head of court management – Power of the judge assigned to verify the lawfulness of the allocation.#Case C-16/24.
junij 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0017: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#CeramTec GmbH v Coorstek Bioceramics LLC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Article 52(1)(a) and (b) – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Bad faith of the applicant – Autonomy and coexistence of the absolute grounds for invalidity – Criteria relevant to determining whether an applicant is acting in bad faith when filing an application for a trade mark – Matters arising after that application is filed.#Case C-17/24.
januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0017_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#CeramTec GmbH v Coorstek Bioceramics LLC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Article 52(1)(a) and (b) – Article 7(1)(e)(ii) – Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result – Bad faith of the applicant – Autonomy and coexistence of the absolute grounds for invalidity – Criteria relevant to determining whether an applicant is acting in bad faith when filing an application for a trade mark – Matters arising after that application is filed.#Case C-17/24.
januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0018: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#NOVIS Insurance Company, NOVIS Versicherungsgesellschaft, NOVIS Compagnia di Assicurazioni, NOVIS Poisťovňa a.s. v Česká národní banka.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services – Single insurance market – Directive 2009/138/EC – Principle of supervision by the home Member State – Article 155 – Competencies of the supervisory authorities of the host Member State – Cooperation with the authorities of the home Member State – Insurance undertaking not complying with the legal provisions applicable in the host Member State – Provisions concerned – Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 – Packaged retail and insurance-based investment products (PRIIPs) – Directive (EU) 2016/97